# Workleap Officevibe vs Leapsome: which do AI models recommend for employee engagement surv, October 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Employee engagement surveys. One of fourteen models named Workleap Officevibe first on the direct prompt; one named Leapsome. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/experience/employee-engagement-surveys/workleap-officevibe-vs-leapsome/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workleap Officevibe | 13% | #2 of 8 | 6% | 35 | 14 of 14 |
| Leapsome | 12% | #3 of 8 | 6% | 17 | 12 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Mistral Small: workleap officevibe first (first choices: Culture Amp, Workleap Officevibe) (alternatives: Eletive, Leapsome)
- Llama 4 Maverick: leapsome first (first choices: Leapsome) (alternatives: CultureMonkey, Workleap Officevibe)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Culture Amp, Lattice) (alternatives: 15Five Engage, Leapsome, Teamflect)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Culture Amp) (alternatives: 15Five Engage, CultureMonkey, Leapsome)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: Lattice) (alternatives: 15Five Engage, Culture Amp, Quantum Workplace, Workleap Officevibe)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Culture Amp, Lattice) (alternatives: Leapsome)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither first, one named (first choices: Culture Amp) (alternatives: Lattice, Workleap Officevibe)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither first, one named (first choices: Culture Amp) (alternatives: 15Five Engage, Lattice, Microsoft Viva Glint, Quantum Workplace, TINYpulse, Workleap Officevibe)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Culture Amp) (alternatives: 15Five Engage, Lattice, Quantum Workplace)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: Culture Amp) (alternatives: Explorance Blue, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, WTW Engage, WorkTango)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: Culture Amp) (alternatives: 15Five Engage, CultureMonkey, Lattice, Quantum Workplace)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Culture Amp) (alternatives: 15Five Engage, Lattice, Microsoft Viva Glint)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Lattice) (alternatives: 15Five Engage)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: Culture Amp) (alternatives: 15Five Engage, Lattice, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, Workday Peakon Employee Voice)

## What the models said about Workleap Officevibe

- "don't shortlist Officevibe based on older $5-per-person pricing articles: Workleap's current published plans start at $4,999/year" (GPT-6 Luna, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "a simpler, much more affordable alternative to Workleap (formerly Officevibe), which recently retired its popular free/cheap tier" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "Workleap (Officevibe) at $5/user/month appears to be the best balance of features, affordability, and ease of use" (MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Workleap Officevibe stands out as the best dedicated employee engagement platform for budget-conscious companies" (Kimi K2, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Officevibe is often cited as the best value for small budgets due to its low per-user cost and simplicity" (Mistral Small, budget prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Leapsome

- "Avoid platforms like Culture Amp, Leapsome, or Qualtrics" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "1. Leapsome - Surveys, performance reviews, learning, goal management for growing companies seeking an all-in-one people platform." (Llama 4 Maverick, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Choose Lattice for a highly polished, US-centric market leader, or Leapsome if you have a global/European footprint" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.