# 365Talents vs Gloat: which do AI models recommend for internal talent marketpl, September 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, Internal talent marketplace. Five of twelve models named 365Talents first on the direct prompt; two named Gloat. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/internal-talent-marketplace/365talents-vs-gloat/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 365Talents | 17% | #2 of 12 | 0% | 19 | 9 of 12 |
| Gloat | 9% | #4 of 12 | 49% | 37 | 11 of 12 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Kimi K2: both first (first choices: 365Talents, Gloat) (alternatives: Fuel50)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 365talents first (first choices: 365Talents) (alternatives: Fuel50, Sprad)
- Mistral Small: 365talents first (first choices: 365Talents) (alternatives: Engagedly, Sprad)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 365talents first (first choices: 365Talents) (alternatives: Fuel50, SkyHive)
- MiniMax M2.5: 365talents first (first choices: 365Talents) (alternatives: Cornerstone OnDemand, Fuel50, TalentGuard, Workday)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: gloat first (first choices: Fuel50, Gloat) (alternatives: Beamery, Sprad, TalentGuard)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: Fuel50) (alternatives: 365Talents, Gloat, Workday)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Nestor) (alternatives: 365Talents, Docebo, Engagedly, Fuel50)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Fuel50) (alternatives: 365Talents, Engagedly)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither first, one named (first choices: Sprad) (alternatives: Gloat, Phenom)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Fuel50) (alternatives: Phenom)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: TalentGuard) (alternatives: Eightfold AI, Fuel50)

## What the models said about 365Talents

- "I'd suggest starting your evaluation with 365Talents or Gloat. 365Talents offers the best price-to-value ratio and fastest implementation for mid-market needs" (Kimi K2, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Specifically noted as ideal for mid-size companies needing skills-driven internal mobility without custom development" (MiniMax M2.5, direct prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Gloat

- "Gloat & Eightfold: Unless you have more than 2,000 employees... these enterprise solutions can result in low adoption and high implementation fatigue." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt, hard negative)
- "avoid these for now. They are expensive to purchase and require substantial, ongoing internal resources to manage effectively." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt, hard negative)
- "Avoid pure enterprises like Gloat/Eightfold: High cost, complex setup, data-hungry AI underperforms at mid-scale." (Grok 4.1 Fast, paraphrase prompt, hard negative)
- "Gloat is a leading *internal mobility* platform, especially for enterprise workforce agility and project matching." (Perplexity Sonar, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Best overall for mid‑market B2B: Fuel50 ... or Gloat (mature gig/project marketplace)" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, direct prompt, first choice)
- "If your priority is unlocking internal mobility → Gloat (pure-play) or suite-native options." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, comparative prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.