# Organimi vs draw.io: which do AI models recommend for org charts, September 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, Org charts and org design. One of twelve models named Organimi first on the direct prompt; zero named draw.io. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/planning/org-charts-and-org-design/organimi-vs-draw-io/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organimi | 17% | #2 of 14 | 5% | 40 | 12 of 12 |
| draw.io | 8% | #5 of 14 | 13% | 15 | 10 of 12 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Claude Haiku 4.5: organimi first (first choices: Organimi) (alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, OneDirectory)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: OrgChart) (alternatives: OneDirectory, Organimi)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChartHub, Organimi, Pingboard, Prolifiq Relationship Map, TeamOhana)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Lucidchart, Pingboard) (alternatives: ChartHop, OneDirectory, Organimi)
- Mistral Small: neither first, one named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither first, one named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Pingboard)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Microsoft Visio, Nakisa, Organimi, SmartDraw)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartHub, Orgvue, Pingboard)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: ChartHop, Pingboard) (alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, OrgChart)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Lucidchart, Organice, Tropic)

## What the models said about Organimi

- "Known for print/export problems (especially on larger orgs) and poor in-browser zoom/visibility." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Organimi (4.3/5) has export/print glitches, poor customization (2/10 in tests), Safari issues" (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Organimi is suitable for organizations of all sizes, from mid-market businesses to global enterprises, making it a scalable solution that grows with your team." (Claude Haiku 4.5, direct prompt, first choice)
- "The best org chart software for a company with a limited budget is Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, or Visme, as they offer affordable monthly fees." (Llama 4 Maverick, budget prompt, first choice)
- "For a startup (<25 employees): Use Organimi. It is the cleanest dedicated tool and costs nothing until you grow." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about draw.io

- "Avoid using general diagramming tools for org charts ... these lack org-specific layout automation. Creating messy connector routing in dense charts is a common problem." (MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "tools like draw.io, Google Drawings, Miro, and sometimes Creately are often described as manual diagramming tools ... they do not provide strong native HR-to-org-chart automation" (Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "start with draw.io (free) or Canva (free tier) for basic needs" (MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Start with draw.io if you're comfortable building charts manually" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Start with draw.io—it's versatile, powerful, and zero cost/risk." (Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.