# Organimi vs Functionly: which do AI models recommend for org charts, October 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Org charts and org design. One of fourteen models named Organimi first on the direct prompt; zero named Functionly. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/planning/org-charts-and-org-design/organimi-vs-functionly/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organimi | 9% | #2 of 13 | 5% | 43 | 14 of 14 |
| Functionly | 4% | #7 of 13 | 7% | 15 | 11 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- GPT-6 Luna: organimi first (first choices: Organimi) (alternatives: ChartHop, OrgChart)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: HiBob, Organimi, Rippling, Sift, TeamOhana)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: OrgChart) (alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChartHub, Organimi)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Pingboard) (alternatives: Lucidchart, Organimi)
- Mistral Small: neither first, one named (first choices: OrgChartHub, Pingboard) (alternatives: Arbor, Ingentis org.manager, Organimi)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: Pingboard) (alternatives: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Organimi)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: BambooHR, Organimi, Pingboard)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither first, one named (first choices: Pingboard) (alternatives: ChartHop, OneDirectory, OrgChartHub, Organimi)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: OrgChart, Pingboard)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Pingboard, The Org)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Luminal) (alternatives: BambooHR, BetterU, Lucidchart, Rippling)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: OneDirectory, OrgChart, Pingboard, Sift)

## What the models said about Organimi

- "Tools reliant on infrequent data syncs (e.g., import-only like some tiers of Organimi or Monday.com)" (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Organimi has data integration issues and is not as scalable as other options" (Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Organimi at ~$20/mo for up to 150 employees is frequently cited as the affordable dedicated option" (Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt, first choice)
- "I'd start with Organimi Premium for a typical mid-market B2B company" (GPT-6 Luna, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Organimi is notable for being completely free for up to 25 users" (Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Functionly

- "Reason for Caution: Extremely Low Customer Support." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "The best organizational design tool for a mid-sized B2B company would be ChartHop or Functionly." (Llama 4 Maverick, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "I'd recommend Functionly as the best organizational design tool" (Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "consider Orgvue / Functionly if you need deeper simulation or API-first recurring change management" (Muse Glimmer 30B, paraphrase prompt, alternative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.