# Organimi vs Lucidchart: which do AI models recommend for org charts, September 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, Org charts and org design. One of twelve models named Organimi first on the direct prompt; one named Lucidchart. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/planning/org-charts-and-org-design/organimi-vs-lucidchart/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organimi | 17% | #2 of 14 | 5% | 40 | 12 of 12 |
| Lucidchart | 6% | #6 of 14 | 23% | 52 | 12 of 12 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Claude Haiku 4.5: organimi first (first choices: Organimi) (alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, OneDirectory)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: lucidchart first (first choices: Lucidchart, Pingboard) (alternatives: ChartHop, OneDirectory, Organimi)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: OrgChart) (alternatives: OneDirectory, Organimi)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChartHub, Organimi, Pingboard, Prolifiq Relationship Map, TeamOhana)
- Mistral Small: neither first, one named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop, Pingboard) (alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, OrgChart)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither first, one named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Lucidchart, Organice, Tropic)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Pingboard)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Microsoft Visio, Nakisa, Organimi, SmartDraw)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartHub, Orgvue, Pingboard)

## What the models said about Organimi

- "Known for print/export problems (especially on larger orgs) and poor in-browser zoom/visibility." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Organimi (4.3/5) has export/print glitches, poor customization (2/10 in tests), Safari issues" (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Organimi is suitable for organizations of all sizes, from mid-market businesses to global enterprises, making it a scalable solution that grows with your team." (Claude Haiku 4.5, direct prompt, first choice)
- "The best org chart software for a company with a limited budget is Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, or Visme, as they offer affordable monthly fees." (Llama 4 Maverick, budget prompt, first choice)
- "For a startup (<25 employees): Use Organimi. It is the cleanest dedicated tool and costs nothing until you grow." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Lucidchart

- "they are dangerous for official organizational documentation... Why to avoid: These tools separate the "map" from the "territory."" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "trying to maintain an org chart in PowerPoint, Visio, or Lucidchart is a losing battle" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, hard negative)
- "avoid one-off tools like Visio or Lucidchart for ongoing use" (Grok 4.1 Fast, scale prompt, hard negative)
- "Pingboard or Lucidchart are safe starts for most B2B mid-market needs due to balance of features, reviews, and scalability." (Grok 4.1 Fast, direct prompt, first choice)
- "I just need a one‑off chart for a slide | Lucidchart (free trial) or Draw.io" (MiniMax M2.5, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "is Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, or Visme, as they offer affordable monthly fees" (Llama 4 Maverick, budget prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.