# Organimi vs OrgChart: which do AI models recommend for org charts, September 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, Org charts and org design. One of twelve models named Organimi first on the direct prompt; one named OrgChart. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/planning/org-charts-and-org-design/organimi-vs-orgchart/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organimi | 17% | #2 of 14 | 5% | 40 | 12 of 12 |
| OrgChart | 12% | #4 of 14 | 28% | 29 | 11 of 12 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Claude Haiku 4.5: organimi first (first choices: Organimi) (alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, OneDirectory)
- GPT-5.4 mini: orgchart first (first choices: OrgChart) (alternatives: OneDirectory, Organimi)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChartHub, Organimi, Pingboard, Prolifiq Relationship Map, TeamOhana)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Lucidchart, Pingboard) (alternatives: ChartHop, OneDirectory, Organimi)
- Mistral Small: neither first, one named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop, Pingboard) (alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, OrgChart)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither first, one named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Pingboard)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Microsoft Visio, Nakisa, Organimi, SmartDraw)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartHub, Orgvue, Pingboard)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Lucidchart, Organice, Tropic)

## What the models said about Organimi

- "Known for print/export problems (especially on larger orgs) and poor in-browser zoom/visibility." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Organimi (4.3/5) has export/print glitches, poor customization (2/10 in tests), Safari issues" (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Organimi is suitable for organizations of all sizes, from mid-market businesses to global enterprises, making it a scalable solution that grows with your team." (Claude Haiku 4.5, direct prompt, first choice)
- "The best org chart software for a company with a limited budget is Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, or Visme, as they offer affordable monthly fees." (Llama 4 Maverick, budget prompt, first choice)
- "For a startup (<25 employees): Use Organimi. It is the cleanest dedicated tool and costs nothing until you grow." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about OrgChart

- "Starts around $105/month with a 100-employee minimum." (Kimi K2, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "requires a minimum of 100 employee records and starts at $105/month billed annually, which can be expensive for smaller organizations" (Mistral Small, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Steep learning curve, not intuitive, complex features requiring coding knowledge, limited customization" (Kimi K2, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "I'd suggest starting with BambooHR or a specialized tool like OrgChart Pro if you need something more focused on organizational structure visualization" (MiniMax M2.5, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "the best org chart software is usually OrgChart if you want the strongest mix of HRIS integration, automated updates, and scalability" (GPT-5.4 mini, direct prompt, first choice)
- "For Workforce Planning + People Analytics: Look at ChartHop or OrgChart." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.