# OrgChart vs Miro: which do AI models recommend for org charts, September 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, Org charts and org design. One of twelve models named OrgChart first on the direct prompt; zero named Miro. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/planning/org-charts-and-org-design/orgchart-vs-miro/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OrgChart | 12% | #4 of 14 | 28% | 29 | 11 of 12 |
| Miro | 4% | #8 of 14 | 20% | 25 | 12 of 12 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- GPT-5.4 mini: orgchart first (first choices: OrgChart) (alternatives: OneDirectory, Organimi)
- Mistral Small: neither first, one named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop, Pingboard) (alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, OrgChart)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither first, one named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Pingboard)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Organimi) (alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, OneDirectory)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChartHub, Organimi, Pingboard, Prolifiq Relationship Map, TeamOhana)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartHub, Orgvue, Pingboard)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: Lucidchart, Pingboard) (alternatives: ChartHop, OneDirectory, Organimi)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Lucidchart, Organice, Tropic)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: OneDirectory) (alternatives: Microsoft Visio, Nakisa, Organimi, SmartDraw)

## What the models said about OrgChart

- "Starts around $105/month with a 100-employee minimum." (Kimi K2, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "requires a minimum of 100 employee records and starts at $105/month billed annually, which can be expensive for smaller organizations" (Mistral Small, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Steep learning curve, not intuitive, complex features requiring coding knowledge, limited customization" (Kimi K2, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "I'd suggest starting with BambooHR or a specialized tool like OrgChart Pro if you need something more focused on organizational structure visualization" (MiniMax M2.5, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "the best org chart software is usually OrgChart if you want the strongest mix of HRIS integration, automated updates, and scalability" (GPT-5.4 mini, direct prompt, first choice)
- "For Workforce Planning + People Analytics: Look at ChartHop or OrgChart." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Miro

- "Miro, FigJam, or basic PowerPoint decks. *   Why to avoid: While great for collaboration, these lack "governance features"" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "manual diagramming tools that can produce org charts, but they do not provide strong native HR-to-org-chart automation" (Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "more robust and data-driven than a simple static diagramming tool (like PowerPoint, Miro, or Lucidchart)" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt, soft negative)
- "My top pick for most mid-sized B2B companies: Start with Miro for visual org design + RACI" (Mistral Small, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "is Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, or Visme, as they offer affordable monthly fees" (Llama 4 Maverick, budget prompt, first choice)
- "For more affordable options, Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, and Visme are also recommended" (Mistral Small, direct prompt, alternative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.