# ChartHop vs HiBob: which do AI models recommend for people analytics, October 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, People analytics. Six of fourteen models named ChartHop first on the direct prompt; three named HiBob. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/planning/people-analytics/charthop-vs-hibob/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChartHop | 21% | #2 of 11 | 12% | 43 | 14 of 14 |
| HiBob | 19% | #3 of 11 | 10% | 29 | 14 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Grok 4.1 Fast: charthop first (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: BambooHR, Culture Amp, Eletive, Lattice, Visier)
- Mistral Small: charthop first (first choices: ChartHop, Crunchr) (alternatives: BambooHR, Eletive)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: charthop first (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: HiBob, Lattice, One Model, Visier)
- Kimi K2: charthop first (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: HiBob, Lattice)
- GPT-6 Luna: charthop first (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: HiBob, Lattice, Visier)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: charthop first (first choices: ChartHop, Crunchr)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: hibob first (first choices: HiBob) (alternatives: Rippling, Visier)
- GPT-5.4 mini: hibob first (first choices: HiBob) (alternatives: Crunchr, PeopleInsight)
- Perplexity Sonar: hibob first (first choices: HiBob) (alternatives: Crunchr)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Knoetic) (alternatives: ChartHop, Culture Amp, Visier)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Crunchr) (alternatives: ChartHop, Culture Amp)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Crunchr, Orgnostic) (alternatives: ChartHop, HiBob, Worklytics)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Crunchr) (alternatives: ChartHop, Culture Amp, Workday People Analytics, Workhuman iQ)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: Crunchr) (alternatives: Ordio, Workhuman iQ)

## What the models said about ChartHop

- "avoid enterprise-focused tools like ... ChartHop ... ChartHop ($2–$8/employee/month) or Lattice may lack the enterprise depth needed for thousands of users." (Mistral Small, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "skip if very tight budget ... $9,000/year minimum contract – a deal-breaker for small teams" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, soft negative)

## What the models said about HiBob

- "Tools like Hibob (Bob) receive positive reviews, but they are frequently flagged for being unsuitable for lightweight or entry-level analytics needs" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "inherently limited when it comes to analyzing external data sources ... and lack the deep predictive algorithms of dedicated engines like Visier." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, comparative prompt, soft negative)
- "First, check if your current HRIS (like Rippling or HiBob) has advanced analytics add-ons that you can simply turn on. This is often the cheapest and easiest route." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)
- "For mid-market B2B companies, HiBob tends to offer the best balance of ease of deployment, affordability, and embedded analytics within an HRIS." (Claude Haiku 4.5, direct prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.