# ChartHop vs Orgnostic: which do AI models recommend for people analytics, October 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, People analytics. Six of fourteen models named ChartHop first on the direct prompt; one named Orgnostic. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/planning/people-analytics/charthop-vs-orgnostic/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChartHop | 21% | #2 of 11 | 12% | 43 | 14 of 14 |
| Orgnostic | 3% | #6 of 11 | 0% | 10 | 7 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Grok 4.1 Fast: charthop first (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: BambooHR, Culture Amp, Eletive, Lattice, Visier)
- Mistral Small: charthop first (first choices: ChartHop, Crunchr) (alternatives: BambooHR, Eletive)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: charthop first (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: HiBob, Lattice, One Model, Visier)
- Kimi K2: charthop first (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: HiBob, Lattice)
- GPT-6 Luna: charthop first (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: HiBob, Lattice, Visier)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: charthop first (first choices: ChartHop, Crunchr)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: orgnostic first (first choices: Crunchr, Orgnostic) (alternatives: ChartHop, HiBob, Worklytics)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Knoetic) (alternatives: ChartHop, Culture Amp, Visier)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Crunchr) (alternatives: ChartHop, Culture Amp)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Crunchr) (alternatives: ChartHop, Culture Amp, Workday People Analytics, Workhuman iQ)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: HiBob) (alternatives: Rippling, Visier)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: HiBob) (alternatives: Crunchr, PeopleInsight)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: HiBob) (alternatives: Crunchr)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: Crunchr) (alternatives: Ordio, Workhuman iQ)

## What the models said about ChartHop

- "avoid enterprise-focused tools like ... ChartHop ... ChartHop ($2–$8/employee/month) or Lattice may lack the enterprise depth needed for thousands of users." (Mistral Small, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "skip if very tight budget ... $9,000/year minimum contract – a deal-breaker for small teams" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, soft negative)

## What the models said about Orgnostic

- "Crunchr (fast, self‑serve, GDPR‑first) or Orgnostic (turnkey, survey‑focused)" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, direct prompt, first choice)
- "For mid-market teams, options often shortlisted are Crunchr, ChartHop, or Orgnostic" (Muse Glimmer 30B, scale prompt, first choice)
- "prioritize out-of-the-box, self-service platforms (like *Crunchr* or *Orgnostic*)" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.