# Crunchr vs Orgnostic: which do AI models recommend for people analytics, October 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, People analytics. Six of fourteen models named Crunchr first on the direct prompt; one named Orgnostic. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/planning/people-analytics/crunchr-vs-orgnostic/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crunchr | 22% | #1 of 11 | 17% | 48 | 13 of 14 |
| Orgnostic | 3% | #6 of 11 | 0% | 10 | 7 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- GLM 4.7 FlashX: both first (first choices: Crunchr, Orgnostic) (alternatives: ChartHop, HiBob, Worklytics)
- Mistral Small: crunchr first (first choices: ChartHop, Crunchr) (alternatives: BambooHR, Eletive)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: crunchr first (first choices: Crunchr) (alternatives: ChartHop, Culture Amp)
- Llama 4 Maverick: crunchr first (first choices: Crunchr) (alternatives: Ordio, Workhuman iQ)
- MiniMax M2.5: crunchr first (first choices: Crunchr) (alternatives: ChartHop, Culture Amp, Workday People Analytics, Workhuman iQ)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: crunchr first (first choices: ChartHop, Crunchr)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: HiBob) (alternatives: Crunchr, PeopleInsight)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: HiBob) (alternatives: Crunchr)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: HiBob) (alternatives: Rippling, Visier)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: Knoetic) (alternatives: ChartHop, Culture Amp, Visier)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: BambooHR, Culture Amp, Eletive, Lattice, Visier)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: HiBob, Lattice, One Model, Visier)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: HiBob, Lattice)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: HiBob, Lattice, Visier)

## What the models said about Crunchr

- "criticized challenger in SMB modelling and included in the enterprise-grade caution list" (Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "avoid enterprise-focused tools like Visier, Workday, One Model, ChartHop, Crunchr" (Mistral Small, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Enterprise tools like Visier/Crunchr (~$50K+/yr) aren't budget-friendly." (Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "In summary, Crunchr is a strong, practical choice for organizations that want straightforward, self-service HR analytics and workforce insights, especially in the mid-market segment." (Muse Glimmer 30B, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "Crunchr and ChartHop are frequently cited as top choices due to their scalability, ease of use, and focus on self-serve analytics." (Mistral Small, direct prompt, first choice)
- "1. Crunchr: Best for mid-market and enterprise HR teams that want self-serve people analytics without building everything in BI." (Llama 4 Maverick, direct prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Orgnostic

- "Crunchr (fast, self‑serve, GDPR‑first) or Orgnostic (turnkey, survey‑focused)" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, direct prompt, first choice)
- "For mid-market teams, options often shortlisted are Crunchr, ChartHop, or Orgnostic" (Muse Glimmer 30B, scale prompt, first choice)
- "prioritize out-of-the-box, self-service platforms (like *Crunchr* or *Orgnostic*)" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.