# TeamOhana vs Planful: which do AI models recommend for workforce planning, October 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Workforce planning. One of fourteen models named TeamOhana first on the direct prompt; two named Planful. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/planning/workforce-planning/teamohana-vs-planful/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeamOhana | 5% | #5 of 15 | 0% | 13 | 8 of 14 |
| Planful | 5% | #6 of 15 | 7% | 15 | 7 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- GPT-6 Luna: teamohana first (first choices: TeamOhana) (alternatives: Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: planful first (first choices: Abacum, Planful) (alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: planful first (first choices: Abacum, Planful) (alternatives: ChartHop, Paylocity, Vena, Visier, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop, HiBob) (alternatives: Paylocity, Planful, Visier)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Aleph, Cube, Lative, Mosaic, Pigment, Runn, TeamOhana)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Planful, Rippling, Visier)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Abacum, Paylocity, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: Workday Adaptive Planning) (alternatives: Anaplan, HiBob, Rippling)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: Paylocity) (alternatives: ChartHop, Drivetrain, HiBob, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: HiBob, Rippling) (alternatives: ChartHop)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Anaplan, Paylocity, Visier)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither named (first choices: ChartHop) (alternatives: Anaplan, Paylocity, Visier, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: HiBob) (alternatives: ChartHop, Paylocity, Rippling)

## What the models said about TeamOhana

- "I'd start with TeamOhana. It's purpose-built to connect Finance, HR, and Talent around a shared hiring plan" (GPT-6 Luna, direct prompt, first choice)
- "My default recommendation: TeamOhana" (GPT-6 Luna, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "## Top Recommendation: TeamOhana" (MiniMax M2.5, paraphrase prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Planful

- "Planful has a steep learning curve and an unintuitive user interface" (Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "For most mid-market B2B companies, Planful or Abacum will deliver the strongest value without enterprise-level costs and complexity." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt, first choice)
- "These are the most commonly recommended for mid-market teams that want FP&A grade modeling without enterprise complexity." (Muse Glimmer 30B, direct prompt, first choice)
- "sweet spot for Workday Adaptive Planning, Planful, Abacum, and Visier" (MiniMax M2.5, scale prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.
