# GoodHire vs Sterling: which do AI models recommend for background screening, October 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Background screening. One of fourteen models named GoodHire first on the direct prompt; one named Sterling. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/talent/background-screening/goodhire-vs-sterling/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GoodHire | 16% | #2 of 12 | 0% | 42 | 13 of 14 |
| Sterling | 2% | #8 of 12 | 32% | 25 | 13 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Qwen 3.7 Flash: goodhire first (first choices: GoodHire) (alternatives: Accurate Background, Checkr, CredCheck, Dun & Bradstreet, Sovren, Verified First)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: sterling first (first choices: Sterling) (alternatives: Checkr, GoodHire, HireRight)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Checkr) (alternatives: Accurate Background, GoodHire, Mitratech AssureHire)
- Mistral Small: neither first, one named (first choices: Mitratech AssureHire) (alternatives: Accurate Background, Sterling)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Accurate Background) (alternatives: Certn, Checkr, GoodHire)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither first, one named (first choices: Mitratech AssureHire) (alternatives: Accurate Background, BackgroundChecks.com, Certn, GoodHire, HireShield)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: Checkr) (alternatives: Accurate Background, Certn, GoodHire, iprospectcheck)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Certn, Checkr) (alternatives: Accurate Background, Cisive, GoodHire)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Checkr, HireRight) (alternatives: Accurate Background, GoodHire, IntelliCorp)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither first, one named (first choices: Bchex, Verified First) (alternatives: Accurate Background, DISA Global Solutions, GoodHire, Mitratech AssureHire, Orange Tree)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Accurate Background, Checkr) (alternatives: Mitratech AssureHire)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: Checkr) (alternatives: Atlantic Employee Screening, Certn, Hireology)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: Checkr) (alternatives: Accurate Background, Certn, Verified First)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: Checkr) (alternatives: Accurate Background, First Advantage)

## What the models said about GoodHire

- "If you want a platform that automates the complex legal disclosures and adverse action forms to protect you from lawsuits: Go with GoodHire ($29.99)." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Best Value for Small Businesses: GoodHire offers affordable background checks for small businesses starting at $29.99." (Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt, first choice)
- "Start with GoodHire for the best mix of price transparency and user experience." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, paraphrase prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Sterling

- "Trustpilot reviews highlight disorganization, incompetence, extremely slow turnaround times (weeks/months), poor customer support" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "$4.75 million FCRA class action settlement for providing outdated information to employers" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Recently sued in 2024 for allegedly falsely reporting criminal history and arrest warrants" (MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Stick with well-established, accredited providers like Sterling, HireRight, GoodHire, or TransUnion SmartMove" (Mistral Small, negative prompt, first choice)
- "Sterling (now part of First Advantage) \u2013 Strongest fit for mid-market B2B." (Grok 4.1 Fast, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Best for: Large enterprises needing comprehensive health screenings - Limitations: Quote-based pricing" (Kimi K2, comparative prompt, alternative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.