# GoodTime vs ModernLoop: which do AI models recommend for interview scheduling, October 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Interview scheduling. Two of fourteen models named GoodTime first on the direct prompt; four named ModernLoop. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/talent/interview-scheduling/goodtime-vs-modernloop/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GoodTime | 16% | #2 of 12 | 18% | 49 | 14 of 14 |
| ModernLoop | 9% | #4 of 12 | 8% | 26 | 13 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Perplexity Sonar: goodtime first (first choices: GoodTime) (alternatives: Calendly Sales, Greenhouse, ModernLoop)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: goodtime first (first choices: GoodTime) (alternatives: Ashby, Lever)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: modernloop first (first choices: ModernLoop) (alternatives: Ashby, GoodTime, Greenhouse)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: modernloop first (first choices: ModernLoop) (alternatives: Ashby, Calendly’s Prelude, GoodTime)
- Kimi K2: modernloop first (first choices: ModernLoop) (alternatives: Ashby, Calendly, GoodTime, Greenhouse, Lever)
- GPT-6 Luna: modernloop first (first choices: ModernLoop) (alternatives: GoodTime, Greenhouse)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: Ashby) (alternatives: Calendly Sales, GoodTime, Prelude)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Calendly) (alternatives: GoodTime, Greenhouse, Lever)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither first, one named (first choices: Greenhouse, Jobvite) (alternatives: GoodTime, candidate.fyi)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: Calendly) (alternatives: Chili Piper, Greenhouse, Lever)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Greenhouse, Lever) (alternatives: Cal.com)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Cal.com, Calendly) (alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: Lever) (alternatives: Cal.com, Greenhouse, Joveo, Workforce Now)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: Lever) (alternatives: Cal.com, Chili Piper, Greenhouse)

## What the models said about GoodTime

- "What to avoid if on a tight budget: Enterprise-level tools like GoodTime or ModernLoop" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "Users report technical issues, including frequent crashes, missing time slots, and incorrect calendar availability display." (GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Caveat: It has a steeper price tag (often starting around $15,000 to $40,000/year) and a longer implementation curve" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt, soft negative)
- "look toward standalone partners like Goodtime or Gem as they are designed specifically for the volume and complexity typical of 500-person companies" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)
- "Platforms like candidate.fyi, GoodTime, and ModernLoop are specifically designed to handle complex, multi-stage panel loops" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)
- "For complex panels, frequent rescheduling, or lots of recruiting coordination, compare GoodTime and ModernLoop." (GPT-6 Luna, comparative prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about ModernLoop

- "they're overkill for a budget-conscious small company" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "you don't need to spend thousands of dollars on enterprise-grade recruiting software like GoodTime or ModernLoop" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "My default pick: ModernLoop—if you’re a mid-market B2B company with a dedicated recruiting team and regular multi-person interview panels." (GPT-6 Luna, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Platforms like candidate.fyi, GoodTime, and ModernLoop are specifically designed to handle complex, multi-stage panel loops" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)
- "Top Pick: ModernLoop ... widely considered the gold standard for mid-market recruiting teams" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.