# TestGorilla vs HackerEarth: which do AI models recommend for technical hiring assessm, October 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Technical hiring assessments. Two of fourteen models named TestGorilla first on the direct prompt; one named HackerEarth. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/talent/technical-hiring-assessments/testgorilla-vs-hackerearth/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TestGorilla | 10% | #5 of 9 | 32% | 28 | 13 of 14 |
| HackerEarth | 7% | #7 of 9 | 13% | 15 | 11 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Claude Haiku 4.5: both first (first choices: HackerEarth, TestGorilla) (alternatives: CodeSignal)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: testgorilla first (first choices: Codility, TestGorilla) (alternatives: CodeSignal, Coderbyte, HackerRank)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: CodeSignal) (alternatives: CoderPad, Codility, TestGorilla, Voomer)
- Kimi K2: neither first, one named (first choices: Coderbyte) (alternatives: HackerRank, TestGorilla)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: HackerRank) (alternatives: CodeSignal, Codility)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: CoderPad, Woven) (alternatives: CodeSignal)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: CodeSignal) (alternatives: Coderbyte, DevSkiller)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: HackerRank) (alternatives: CodeSignal, CoderPad, Coderbyte, Codility)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Goodfit) (alternatives: HackerRank)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Codility) (alternatives: CodeSignal, HackerRank)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: Goodfit) (alternatives: CodeSignal, Coderbyte, HackerRank)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: Codility) (alternatives: AssessHub, CoderPad, HackerRank)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: CodeSignal Hire Grow) (alternatives: CoderPad, HackerRank)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: CodeSignal, DevSkiller, HackerRank) (alternatives: Codility)

## What the models said about TestGorilla

- "TestGorilla-style general testing platforms when your need is deep technical screening, because they are broader assessment suites rather than specialized developer tools." (Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "HackerEarth and TestGorilla stand out for their balance of features, pricing accessibility, and ATS integration compatibility without requiring full enterprise implementations." (Claude Haiku 4.5, direct prompt, first choice)
- "If you need zero upfront cost: start with TestGorilla’s free plan or LeetCode’s free problem bank for initial screening" (Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about HackerEarth

- "Similar to HackerRank in being low-cost, but with less-modern technology." (Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "Weaker auto-cheat detection per tests." (Grok 4.1 Fast, comparative prompt, soft negative)
- "For mid-market B2B companies specifically, HackerEarth and TestGorilla stand out for their balance of features, pricing accessibility, and ATS integration compatibility" (Claude Haiku 4.5, direct prompt, first choice)
- "The best coding assessment platform for a company with a limited budget is HackerEarth, which offers coding tests and live technical interviews on a modest budget." (Llama 4 Maverick, budget prompt, first choice)
- "HackerEarth or TestGorilla would be the best starting points due to their affordability" (MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.