# Figures: how AI models rank it, September 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition. Named in 26 judge labels across 3 categories by 9 of 12 models. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/vendors/figures/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | 0% | 36 | 0% | 16 |
| Compensation benchmarking data | 0% | 25 | 0% | 6 |
| Pay equity | 0% | 29 | 0% | 4 |

## What the models said for it

- "(e.g., Pave, Ravio, or Figures)" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, Compensation benchmarkin)
- "A strong low-friction entry for HR teams that want approval-controlled planning outputs with repeatable reporting." (Llama 4 Maverick, Compensation management)
- "250–5,000 typically benefit from purpose-built platforms like Figures or Pave" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, Compensation management)
- "Top for European/global teams and compliance (e.g., EU Pay Transparency)" (Grok 4.1 Fast, Compensation management)

## Record

- Method: https://hr-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://hr-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as HR AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, hr-ai-index.com.