# Functionly: how AI models rank it, September 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition. Named in 11 judge labels across 1 categories by 6 of 12 models. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/vendors/functionly/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts and org design | 0% | 17 | 18% | 11 |

## What the models said for it

- "2. Functionly - for collaborative organizational design, charting, and workforce planning software." (Llama 4 Maverick, Org charts)
- "such as OneDirectory, Organimi, OrgChart, Ingentis org.manager, Sift, or Functionly" (Grok 4.1 Fast, Org charts)
- "Built for org‑design teams running recurring changes with API‑based integration" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, Org charts)
- "want a lighter, cheaper self-serve tool → consider Functionly" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Org charts)

## And against it

- "Functionly (high ease but 2/10 support). Okay for small teams (<150 people), but scalability/export problems emerge." (Grok 4.1 Fast, Org charts)
- "Forbes rated its customer service very poorly (2/10 ease-of-support category), despite strong features." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Org charts)

## Record

- Method: https://hr-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://hr-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as HR AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, hr-ai-index.com.