# GoodTime: how AI models rank it, September 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition. Named in 49 judge labels across 2 categories by 12 of 12 models. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/vendors/goodtime/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | 9% | 5 | 24% | 45 |
| AI recruiting assistants | 0% | 27 | 0% | 4 |

## What the models said for it

- "Choose GoodTime if you have a dedicated recruiting team and want to automate the administrative side of interviewing" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, Interview scheduling)
- "GoodTime is the top choice for enterprises whose scheduling challenge extends beyond simple booking" (Claude Haiku 4.5, Interview scheduling)
- "Best overall for mid-market recruiting teams: GoodTime if you run multi-interviewer panels" (GPT-5.4 mini, Interview scheduling)
- "Differentiator: The gold standard for high-volume, complex multi-panel coordination at scale" (Kimi K2, Interview scheduling)

## And against it

- "Avoid ATS-style recruiting platforms like Breezy HR, Workable, or GoodTime if budget is tight" (Perplexity Sonar, Interview scheduling)
- "Enterprise, quote-only, often thousands per month — avoid these on a limited budget" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Interview scheduling)
- "Frequent reports of bugs like missing time slots, crashes, slow performance, calendar sync glitches, and timezone issues." (Grok 4.1 Fast, Interview scheduling)
- "Some users report frequent bugs related to calendar syncing and occasional unresponsiveness in customer support." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, Interview scheduling)

## Record

- Method: https://hr-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://hr-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as HR AI Recommendation Index, September 2026 Edition, hr-ai-index.com.