Benefits administration · September 2026 Edition
PlanSource vs Gusto
Six of twelve models named PlanSource first on the direct prompt; zero named Gusto. PlanSource was named by eleven of the twelve models and Gusto by twelve and PlanSource carries 32 labels and Gusto 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in eighteen categories this edition.
First-choice share23%18%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%16%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels3237A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, PlanSource reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Rippling was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. PlanSource vs Employee Navigator · PlanSource vs Rippling · PlanSource vs Ease
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the benefits administration page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PlanSourceFirst choices, of twelve modelsGusto
Direct601 against Gusto
Paraphrase40
Comparative12
Budget-constrained08
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against PlanSource · 5 against Gusto
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
Every model, every framing
The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where PlanSource and Gusto stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | | | |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | |
PlanSource Gusto first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, PlanSource on the left and Gusto on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where PlanSource and Gusto stood in it.
PlanSource first, Gusto not the choice
6 of 12 modelsGusto was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Perplexity SonarPlanSource, Rippling alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Employee Navigator, Paycor, Paylocity
DeepSeek V4 FlashPlanSource alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Employee Navigator, Paycor, Rippling
Llama 4 MaverickPlanSource alternatives: Employee Navigator, Paycor, Rippling
Qwen 3.7 FlashPlanSource alternatives: Employee Navigator, Namely, Paycor, Paylocity, UKG Pro
Kimi K2PlanSource alternatives: Employee Navigator, Rippling
GLM 4.7 FlashXPlanSource alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Benefitfocus, Businessolver, Ease, Employee Navigator, Paycor, Paylocity, Rippling, bswift
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Namely, Paycor, Paylocity, PlanSource
Gemini 3.5 FlashRippling alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Employee Navigator, PlanSource
Mistral SmallRippling alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Employee Navigator, Paycor, PlanSource
MiniMax M2.5Namely alternatives: ADP, Gusto, Justworks, Rippling, Workday HCM
Neither was named
2 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniRippling alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Justworks, Paylocity
Grok 4.1 FastADP Workforce Now alternatives: Paycor, Rippling
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Gusto leads by sixty-eight points.
Gusto68%#1 of 13PlanSource0%#11 of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: PlanSource leads at mid-market.
PlanSource23%#1 of 14Gusto18%#4 of 14Enterprise
What the models said about PlanSource
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“PlanSource: Users have noted complaints about work status event complexity, document library organization, and some delays in carrier file setup.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious if you have under 250 employees, need benefits bundled with payroll” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“PlanSource - a dedicated benefit enrollment system for the 100–1,000 employee range with decision-support tooling, billing reconciliation, and a large carrier-feed library.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with PlanSource if you want a dedicated benefits platform, or Rippling if you prefer an all-in-one HRIS solution” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose PlanSource if you want a powerful, dedicated benefits tool that sits well alongside your existing HR stack.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Gusto
No label in this category carried a quote.
Also compared
PlanSource vs Employee NavigatorPlanSource vs RipplingPlanSource vs EasePlanSource vs PaycorPlanSource vs ADP Workforce NowPlanSource vs BenefitfocusEmployee Navigator vs GustoRippling vs GustoGusto vs EaseGusto vs PaycorGusto vs ADP Workforce NowGusto vs BenefitfocusAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full benefits administration standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.