Four of twelve models named BambooHR first on the direct prompt; zero named Connecteam. BambooHR was named by twelve of the twelve models and Connecteam by ten and BambooHR carries 41 labels and Connecteam 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in twenty-four categories this edition.
Named in seventeen categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the leave and absence management page.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Generic HR Platforms with Weak Leave Modules ... Tools like BambooHR receive consistent complaints about: Limited customization” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid full HR like BambooHR/Gusto ($6+/user or flat fees) unless you need payroll too.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
No label in this category carried a quote.
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.