SeekOut vs Loxo
Two of twelve models named SeekOut first on the direct prompt; zero named Loxo. SeekOut was named by twelve of the twelve models and Loxo by eleven and SeekOut carries 31 labels and Loxo 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in six categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the talent intelligence page.
By framing
SeekOutFirst choices, of twelve modelsLoxo
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
SeekOut Loxo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, SeekOut on the left and Loxo on the right.The direct prompt
SeekOut first, Loxo not the choice
2 of 12 modelsLoxo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
SeekOut6%#7 of 17Loxo4%#8 of 17What the models said about SeekOut
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Avoid Eightfold or SeekOut unless you are at the upper end of the mid-market” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise heavies like Eightfold/SeekOut ($800+/seat, Fortune 500 focus)” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · hard negative
“Data Integrity & Stale Databases (e.g., SeekOut, hireEZ)... users frequently complain about "stale data"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you want one platform for a typical mid-market B2B company, I'd start with SeekOut for external talent intelligence and sourcing.” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with SeekOut or hireEZ as they specifically position themselves as talent intelligence platforms” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Loxo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Loxo has faced criticism where users found the interview process features underdeveloped and unintuitive” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Loxo (Honorable) | Limited/solo only (now trial-like) | $149/mo ... All-in-one (less budget)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“or Loxo if you need robust all-in-one functionality at a reasonable price point” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“the best choice is usually Loxo or Jobin.cloud” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.