HR AI Index
Index Workforce planning and analytics People analytics › Visier vs Lattice
People analytics · September 2026 Edition

Visier vs Lattice

Three of twelve models named Visier first on the direct prompt; zero named Lattice. Visier was named by twelve of the twelve models and Lattice by eleven and Visier carries 48 labels and Lattice 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Visier

criticized challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

Lattice

accepted challenger

Named in nineteen categories this edition.

First-choice share11%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate44%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels4822A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Visier reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartHop was named alongside these two in eight of the twelve direct answers. HiBob vs Visier · HiBob vs Lattice · Crunchr vs Visier

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the people analytics page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
VisierFirst choices, of twelve modelsLattice
Direct306 against Visier
Paraphrase21
Comparative901 against Lattice
Budget-constrained014 against Visier · 1 against Lattice
Scale-constrained103 against Visier
Negative008 against Visier
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Visier and Lattice stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Visier Lattice first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Visier on the left and Lattice on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Visier and Lattice stood in it.

Visier first, Lattice an alternative

3 of 12 modelsLattice was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniVisier alternatives: ChartHop, Crunchr, Workday Peakon
Qwen 3.7 FlashVisier alternatives: Culture Amp, HiBob, Looker, Tableau
MiniMax M2.5Visier alternatives: Lattice, Workday HCM

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastCrunchr alternatives: ChartHop, Lattice
Mistral SmallCrunchr alternatives: HiBob, Lattice
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop, Crunchr alternatives: Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, Orgnostic
Kimi K2Crunchr alternatives: ChartHop, Visier

Neither was named

5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5HiBob alternatives: Rippling, UKG People Analytics
Gemini 3.5 FlashKnoetic alternatives: ChartHop, Culture Amp, Illoominus, Paradox
Perplexity SonarCrunchr, HiBob alternatives: ChartHop, Culture Amp
Llama 4 MaverickChartHop
GLM 4.7 FlashXCrunchr alternatives: BambooHR, ChartHop, Personio

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Lattice leads by eight points.
Lattice8%#3 of 16
Visier0%#16 of 16
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Visier leads at mid-market.
Visier11%#4 of 12
Lattice4%#6 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Visier leads by sixty-five points.
Visier65%#1 of 9
Lattice0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Visier

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Enterprise platforms like Visier offer custom enterprise pricing and implementation complexity that make them a poor fit for small to mid-market organizations.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid in the Mid-Market ... Visier or One Model ... generally poor fits for the mid-market” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools. Visier, Workday, and Eightfold AI typically require 500\u20131,000+ employees” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“The category standard. Pre-built people-data model, deep metric library, 30M+ employee benchmarks, strong forecasting. Very powerful but complex.” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“| 1 | Visier | Large enterprises with complex, multi‑source workforce data | Deep workforce analytics, AI‑powered insights” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Market leader in people analytics, known for workforce planning, talent acquisition, and employee engagement.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Lattice

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Best Dedicated People Analytics Platform ... Lattice is widely considered one of the most accessible people ops platforms for growing companies.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.