Workforce planning · September 2026 Edition
Planful vs Visier
Two of twelve models named Planful first on the direct prompt; one named Visier. Planful was named by ten of the twelve models and Visier by eleven and Planful carries 23 labels and Visier 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in eight categories this edition.
First-choice share8%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%22%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels2327A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Planful reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Workday Adaptive Planning was named alongside these two in eight of the twelve direct answers. ChartHop vs Planful · ChartHop vs Visier · Homebase vs Planful
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workforce planning page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PlanfulFirst choices, of twelve modelsVisier
Direct211 against Visier
Paraphrase201 against Visier
Comparative00
Budget-constrained001 against Planful · 1 against Visier
Scale-constrained001 against Visier
Negative002 against Visier
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
Every model, every framing
The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Planful and Visier stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
Planful Visier first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Planful on the left and Visier on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Planful and Visier stood in it.
Planful first, Visier an alternative
2 of 12 modelsVisier was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.DeepSeek V4 FlashPlanful, Workday Adaptive Planning alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, ChartHop, Paylocity, Pigment, Visier
Qwen 3.7 FlashPlanful alternatives: Abacum, Orgvue, Paylocity, Visier, Workday Adaptive Planning
Visier first, Planful not the choice
1 of 12 modelsPlanful was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.MiniMax M2.5Dayforce, Visier alternatives: Workday
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Abacum, HiBob, Paylocity, Visier
Grok 4.1 FastRippling alternatives: ChartHop, Paylocity, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning
Mistral SmallWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, HiBob, Paylocity, Planful, Visier
Llama 4 MaverickWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Abacum, HiBob, Paylocity, Planful, Visier
GLM 4.7 FlashXHiBob alternatives: Planful, Visier
Neither was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5ChartHop alternatives: Deel, HiBob, Paylocity, Pigment
GPT-5.4 miniHiBob alternatives: Anaplan, Rippling, Workday Adaptive Planning
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: Abacum, Mosaic, Pigment, Rippling, TeamOhana
Kimi K2Rippling alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, HiBob, Paylocity, Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planning
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Planful0%#– of 12Visier0%#– of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Planful2%#– of 9Visier2%#6 of 9What the models said about Planful
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Planful/PlanGuru — but these are usually more expensive” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Planful often being the better fit if you want a more approachable mid-market FP&A tool that includes workforce planning” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Planful if you have 200+ employees and want strong finance integration” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Finance & HR Collaboration: Planful” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Visier
No label in this category carried a quote.
Also compared
ChartHop vs PlanfulChartHop vs VisierHomebase vs PlanfulHomebase vs VisierRippling vs PlanfulRippling vs VisierWorkday Adaptive Planning vs PlanfulWorkday Adaptive Planning vs VisierPlanful vs HiBobPlanful vs AbacumHiBob vs VisierAbacum vs VisierAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full workforce planning standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.