Workforce planning · September 2026 Edition
Workday Adaptive Planning vs Abacum
Four of twelve models named Workday Adaptive Planning first on the direct prompt; zero named Abacum. Workday Adaptive Planning was named by twelve of the twelve models and Abacum by eight and Workday Adaptive Planning carries 39 labels and Abacum 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share8%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate21%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#7A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels3911A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Workday Adaptive Planning reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Paylocity was named alongside these two in eight of the twelve direct answers. ChartHop vs Workday Adaptive Planning · ChartHop vs Abacum · Homebase vs Workday Adaptive Planning
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workforce planning page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Workday Adaptive PlanningFirst choices, of twelve modelsAbacum
Direct401 against Workday Adaptive Planning
Paraphrase024 against Workday Adaptive Planning
Comparative10
Budget-constrained001 against Workday Adaptive Planning
Scale-constrained001 against Workday Adaptive Planning
Negative001 against Workday Adaptive Planning
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
Every model, every framing
The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Workday Adaptive Planning and Abacum stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
Workday Adaptive Planning Abacum first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Workday Adaptive Planning on the left and Abacum on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Workday Adaptive Planning and Abacum stood in it.
Workday Adaptive Planning first, Abacum an alternative
4 of 12 modelsAbacum was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Perplexity SonarWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Abacum, HiBob, Paylocity, Visier
Mistral SmallWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, HiBob, Paylocity, Planful, Visier
DeepSeek V4 FlashPlanful, Workday Adaptive Planning alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, ChartHop, Paylocity, Pigment, Visier
Llama 4 MaverickWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Abacum, HiBob, Paylocity, Planful, Visier
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniHiBob alternatives: Anaplan, Rippling, Workday Adaptive Planning
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: Abacum, Mosaic, Pigment, Rippling, TeamOhana
Grok 4.1 FastRippling alternatives: ChartHop, Paylocity, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning
Qwen 3.7 FlashPlanful alternatives: Abacum, Orgvue, Paylocity, Visier, Workday Adaptive Planning
Kimi K2Rippling alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, HiBob, Paylocity, Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planning
Neither was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5ChartHop alternatives: Deel, HiBob, Paylocity, Pigment
GLM 4.7 FlashXHiBob alternatives: Planful, Visier
MiniMax M2.5Dayforce, Visier alternatives: Workday
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Abacum is not named for this buyer.
Workday Adaptive Planning0%#11 of 12Abacum—not namedMid-marketThe figures above
Workday Adaptive Planning leads by four points.
Workday Adaptive Planning8%#4 of 13Abacum4%#7 of 13Enterprise
Workday Adaptive Planning leads by twenty-nine points.
Workday Adaptive Planning29%#2 of 9Abacum0%#– of 9What the models said about Workday Adaptive Planning
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“you do not need the extreme complexity, high licensing costs, and long implementation times of enterprise legacy tools like Anaplan or Workday Adaptive Planning” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“without the extreme cost and complexity of enterprise tools (like Anaplan or Workday Adaptive Planning)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“avoid the heavy implementation overhead of enterprise tools like Workday Adaptive Planning or Anaplan” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Best for: Finance-led headcount planning... making it the best option for aligning recruiting plans directly with the CFO's budget.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“the best default choice is usually Workday Adaptive Planning if you need serious headcount, scenario, and budget planning” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
“Ideal if you're already using Workday HCM and want seamless integration for workforce planning alongside financial planning.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Abacum
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Abacum — Best for scaling mid-market businesses that need HR and Finance to plan from a single source of truth with integrated financial modeling.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest ChartHop if your Head of People/HR wants to drive the process, or Abacum if your CFO/Finance team wants to lead.” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“mid-market teams may benefit from lighter tools like Abacum or Planful before investing in a dedicated workforce planning suite” Llama 4 Maverick · scale prompt · alternative
Also compared
ChartHop vs Workday Adaptive PlanningChartHop vs AbacumHomebase vs Workday Adaptive PlanningHomebase vs AbacumRippling vs Workday Adaptive PlanningRippling vs AbacumWorkday Adaptive Planning vs PlanfulWorkday Adaptive Planning vs HiBobWorkday Adaptive Planning vs VisierPlanful vs AbacumHiBob vs AbacumAbacum vs VisierAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full workforce planning standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.