HR AI Index
Index Talent acquisition Applicant tracking syste › Breezy HR vs Workable
Applicant tracking systems · September 2026 Edition

Breezy HR vs Workable

Zero of twelve models named Breezy HR first on the direct prompt; one named Workable. Breezy HR was named by eleven of the twelve models and Workable by twelve and Breezy HR carries 19 labels and Workable 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Breezy HR

accepted challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

Workable

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share18%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#6A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1936A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Breezy HR reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Greenhouse was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. Greenhouse vs Breezy HR · Greenhouse vs Workable · Breezy HR vs Zoho Recruit

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the applicant tracking systems page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Breezy HRFirst choices, of twelve modelsWorkable
Direct01
Paraphrase01
Comparative00
Budget-constrained80
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Breezy HR
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Breezy HR and Workable were named in the same answer ninety-one times, of the 167 answers naming Breezy HR and the 288 naming Workable. In those answers Workable took the first choice thirteen times and Breezy HR twenty-one.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Breezy HR and Workable stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Breezy HR Workable first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Breezy HR on the left and Workable on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Breezy HR and Workable stood in it.

Workable first, Breezy HR not the choice

1 of 12 modelsBreezy HR was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
DeepSeek V4 FlashGreenhouse, Workable alternatives: Ashby

Neither was the first choice, one was named

9 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniGreenhouse alternatives: Lever, SmartRecruiters, Workable
Perplexity SonarGreenhouse alternatives: Ashby, Pinpoint, Workable
Grok 4.1 FastGreenhouse alternatives: Lever, Workable
Mistral SmallGreenhouse, Pinpoint alternatives: Lever, Workable
Llama 4 MaverickPinpoint alternatives: Greenhouse, JazzHR, Lever, Workable
Qwen 3.7 FlashGreenhouse alternatives: Lever, Pinpoint, Workable
Kimi K2Greenhouse alternatives: Ashby, Pinpoint, Workable
GLM 4.7 FlashXGreenhouse alternatives: Ashby, BambooHR, Lever, Workable
MiniMax M2.5Greenhouse, Lever alternatives: Pinpoint, Workable, Zoho Recruit

Neither was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Gemini 3.5 FlashAshby alternatives: BambooHR, Greenhouse, Lever, Rippling

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Breezy HR leads by twenty-two points.
Breezy HR41%#1 of 11
Workable20%#2 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Breezy HR leads by thirteen points.
Breezy HR18%#2 of 13
Workable4%#6 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Workable leads at enterprise.
Workable7%#– of 8
Breezy HR0%#– of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Breezy HR

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Breezy HR (owned by LTG) - a clean, affordable SMB system with a genuinely free plan, but it narrowly misses the list on AI depth.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“Breezy HR's "Bootstrap" plan is permanently free... one of the most intuitive, visual Kanban-style drag-and-drop pipelines on the market.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Breezy HR offers the best balance of simplicity, automation, and value \u2014 with a free tier and paid plans from $157 per month.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“The best applicant tracking system for a company with a limited budget is Breezy HR, which offers a free Bootstrap plan” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Workable

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.