HR AI Index
Index Talent acquisition Job advertising › Indeed vs LinkedIn
Job advertising and distribution · September 2026 Edition

Indeed vs LinkedIn

Zero of twelve models named Indeed first on the direct prompt; zero named LinkedIn. Indeed was named by twelve of the twelve models and LinkedIn by eleven and Indeed carries 29 labels and LinkedIn 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Indeed

criticized challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

LinkedIn

criticized challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

First-choice share3%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate34%32%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels2919A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Indeed reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Joveo was named alongside these two in twelve of the twelve direct answers. JobTarget vs Indeed · JobTarget vs LinkedIn · Joveo vs Indeed

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the job advertising and distribution page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
IndeedFirst choices, of twelve modelsLinkedIn
Direct001 against Indeed
Paraphrase11
Comparative911 against Indeed
Budget-constrained001 against Indeed
Scale-constrained00
Negative137 against Indeed · 6 against LinkedIn
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Indeed and LinkedIn were named in the same answer fifty-seven times, of the 119 answers naming Indeed and the 75 naming LinkedIn. In those answers LinkedIn took the first choice five times and Indeed ten.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Indeed and LinkedIn stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Indeed LinkedIn first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Indeed on the left and LinkedIn on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Indeed and LinkedIn stood in it.

Neither was named

12 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Joveo alternatives: Appcast, JobTarget
GPT-5.4 miniJoveo alternatives: Appcast, JobTarget, Talroo
Gemini 3.5 FlashAdway alternatives: Appcast, JobTarget, Joveo
Perplexity SonarJobTarget alternatives: Appcast, Joveo, Recruitics
Grok 4.1 FastJoveo alternatives: Appcast, Radancy, Recruitics
Mistral SmallJoveo alternatives: Adaptive Talent, Appcast
DeepSeek V4 FlashJoveo alternatives: Appcast
Llama 4 MaverickJoveo alternatives: MindMatch
Qwen 3.7 FlashJoveo alternatives: Appcast, JobTarget, Recruitics
Kimi K2Joveo alternatives: Recruitics
GLM 4.7 FlashXJobTarget alternatives: Appcast, Joveo, Recruitics
MiniMax M2.5Appcast, JobTarget alternatives: Joveo, Talroo

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Indeed0%#7 of 9
LinkedIn0%#8 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Indeed3%#5 of 11
LinkedIn3%#6 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Indeed0%#8 of 9
LinkedIn0%#9 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Indeed

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Many major platforms (including Indeed and ZipRecruiter) have shifted heavily toward pay-per-click or pay-per-application models. Without strict guardrails... budget vampires” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Sites like Indeed, Monster, and CareerBuilder are not "bad," but they are massive open markets where almost anyone can create a job posting.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Job search scams target U.S. job seekers on popular platforms like Indeed, LinkedIn, ZipRecruiter, and Handshake” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Stick to well-established, reputable job boards with strong verification systems, such as LinkedIn, Indeed, Monster, Glassdoor, and CareerBuilder.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice
“Commonly ranked as the best overall or #1 by postings volume, making it strongest for reach across many roles.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“Indeed dominates in sheer volume, making it ideal for employers seeking a large pool of applicants quickly.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about LinkedIn

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Scams are commonly carried out through Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp, Telegram, LinkedIn, and similar channels, especially when the recruiter contacts you first.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“98 percent of scam vacancies analyzed were found on LinkedIn, though this doesn't mean LinkedIn itself is unsafe” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Stick to well-established, reputable job boards with strong verification systems, such as LinkedIn, Indeed, Monster, Glassdoor, and CareerBuilder.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice
“Stick to well-known boards with strong verification (LinkedIn, Glassdoor, FlexJobs is human-reviewed” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.