HR AI Index
Index Talent acquisition Technical hiring assessm › HackerRank vs Coderbyte
Technical hiring assessments · September 2026 Edition

HackerRank vs Coderbyte

Six of twelve models named HackerRank first on the direct prompt; zero named Coderbyte. HackerRank was named by twelve of the twelve models and Coderbyte by eleven and HackerRank carries 57 labels and Coderbyte 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.

HackerRank

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

Coderbyte

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share28%13%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate21%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 6; printed, not drawn.
Labels5713A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, HackerRank reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CodeSignal was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. HackerRank vs CoderPad · CoderPad vs Coderbyte

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the technical hiring assessments page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
HackerRankFirst choices, of twelve modelsCoderbyte
Direct601 against HackerRank
Paraphrase401 against HackerRank
Comparative40
Budget-constrained154 against HackerRank
Scale-constrained00
Negative006 against HackerRank · 1 against Coderbyte
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where HackerRank and Coderbyte stood in it.

HackerRank first, Coderbyte an alternative

6 of 12 modelsCoderbyte was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal, CoderPad, Codility
Perplexity SonarHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal, CoderPad, Coderbyte, Goodfit
Grok 4.1 FastHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal, Coderbyte
Mistral SmallHackerRank alternatives: Augment Code, Coderbyte
Qwen 3.7 FlashHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal, TestDome, Vervoe
GLM 4.7 FlashXHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
DeepSeek V4 FlashCodeSignal alternatives: Codility, HackerRank, TestGorilla
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice alternatives: CodeSignal, CoderPad, Coderbyte, Goodfit, HackerRank
Kimi K2Codility alternatives: CodeSignal, Coderbyte, HackerRank, TestGorilla
MiniMax M2.5CodeSignal alternatives: Augment Code, HackerRank, TestGorilla

Neither was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Gemini 3.5 FlashCoderPad alternatives: CodeSignal, HackerEarth, TestGorilla

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
HackerRank9%#5 of 7
Coderbyte9%#3 of 7
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
HackerRank leads by fifteen points.
HackerRank28%#1 of 6
Coderbyte13%#3 of 6
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
HackerRank leads by thirty-three points.
HackerRank42%#1 of 6
Coderbyte9%#– of 6
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about HackerRank

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Users frequently complain about "overage fees." ... Googleable Questions: ... default assessments are often easily searchable online.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“buggy UI/UX ... High drop-off rates and "horrible experience" sentiments” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why we recommend avoiding HackerRank or Codility (for now)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Qualified (free) and HackerRank Starter ($99/mo) offer the best balance of cost, reliability, and candidate familiarity” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for: End-to-end enterprise technical hiring. ... broadest platform and largest general hiring workflow” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“the best *default* choice is usually HackerRank if your priority is technical hiring at scale” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Coderbyte

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Coderbyte has a mixed reputation. While it is widely used, it suffers from specific reliability and validity issues” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“the best fit is usually Coderbyte or TestDome, with Coderbyte having the strongest support in the results as a cost-effective option” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Coderbyte stands out as one of the best coding assessment platforms due to its affordable entry-level pricing” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“CoderByte offers all-inclusive pricing and is affordable if you're hiring on a budget” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.