HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Calendly-style links · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Calendly-style links

1Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Calendly-style links was named 1 time in Interview scheduling, where Calendly led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market60 of 72

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In interview scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Calendly-style links for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Interview scheduling	Talent acquisition	0%	60 of 72	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Calendly-style links yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Calendly-style links across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid or use caution with generic self-scheduling tools like Calendly-style links when your hiring process involves panel interviews, multi-round loops, multiple time zones, or high interview volume” Perplexity Sonar · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Calendly-style links. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named Calendly-style links and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

asymbl.com1

cal.com1

candidate.fyi1

eztrackr.app1

fluentbooking.com1

hiretruffle.com1

humanly.io1

kula.ai1

learn.g2.com1

lunacal.ai1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Calendly-style links came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

asymbl.com/blog/automated-interview-scheduling1

cal.com/blog/best-interview-scheduling-software1

candidate.fyi/post/interview-scheduling-tool1

eztrackr.app/blog/interview-scheduling-tools1

fluentbooking.com/articles/best-interview-scheduling-software1

hiretruffle.com/blog/interview-scheduling-tools1

humanly.io/blog/automated-interview-scheduling-software-friction1

kula.ai/blog/interview-scheduling-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Calendly-style links's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Calendly-style links, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at calendly.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.