Eight of twelve models named Rippling first on the direct prompt; five named Paylocity. Rippling was named by twelve of the twelve models and Paylocity by eleven and Rippling carries 44 labels and Paylocity 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in twenty-eight categories this edition.
Named in twenty categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the payroll software page.
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Experts warn against using Rippling if you have fewer than 100 employees, as it is considered overkill and can be very costly for smaller businesses.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“here are the platforms you should be cautious about and why: ### 1. Paylocity ... claim the software causes significant errors in payroll processing” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“multiple user discussions describe poor support and technical issues, so it is a candidate for extra due diligence” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · hard negative
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.