Three of fourteen models named Pave first on the direct prompt; four named Payscale. Pave was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Payscale by fourteen and Pave carries 27 labels and Payscale 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in six categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the compensation benchmarking data page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Pave and Payscale were named in the same answer ninety-seven times, of the 219 answers naming Pave and the 247 naming Payscale. In those answers Payscale took the first choice nine times and Pave thirty-one.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Pave is the most practical choice for many early-stage companies because it is explicitly called out as a free benchmarking option” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“These tools rely heavily on self-reported employee data or web-scraped job postings, which often lack accurate job leveling, context, and verification.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid expensive enterprise solutions like PayScale (~$12,000+/year)” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Payscale was flagged for high-complexity executive roles with the note "These platforms often suffer from 'self-selection bias.'"” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Payscale offers the most established survey-based market pricing with AI job matching... better for mid-market companies building structured compensation frameworks” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with Payscale or SalaryCube — both offer the right balance of data quality, usability, and cost for mid-market needs.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“the most budget-friendly and accessible option is Payscale’s free tier, which provides basic salary benchmarking data” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.