Two of twelve models named Payscale first on the direct prompt; four named PayAnalytics. Payscale was named by twelve of the twelve models and PayAnalytics by eleven and Payscale carries 34 labels and PayAnalytics 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the pay equity page.
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Repeated complaints about a clunky, outdated interface, a steep learning curve, data inaccuracy for niche roles... don't buy it purely for equity.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Enterprise tools like ... PayAnalytics ... out of reach on a tight budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Known for robust benchmark-linked pay gap reporting and documented inputs for remediation decisions, making it a strong fit for mid-size teams.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“the strongest fit is usually PayAnalytics because it explicitly positions itself for teams *working within a set budget*” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: PayAnalytics ... often the go-to recommendation for mid-sized companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.