Every category where a model named PayAnalytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Pay equity	Compensation and total rewards	14%	3 of 60	4%	26	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PayAnalytics yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PayAnalytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	0	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	0	2
Mistral Small	1	0	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	1	0	0	3
Kimi K2	0	2	1	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct22 labels5

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative21 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labels2

Scale-constrained9 labels1

Negative4 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative77 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Known for robust benchmark-linked pay gap reporting and documented inputs for remediation decisions, making it a strong fit for mid-size teams.” Mistral Small · Pay equity · direct prompt · first choice

“the strongest fit is usually PayAnalytics because it explicitly positions itself for teams *working within a set budget*” Perplexity Sonar · Pay equity · budget prompt · first choice

“The Best All-Rounder: PayAnalytics ... often the go-to recommendation for mid-sized companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Pay equity · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“PayAnalytics is the market leader... Choose PayAnalytics if you have a global B2B workforce” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Pay equity · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Enterprise tools like ... PayAnalytics ... out of reach on a tight budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Pay equity · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PayAnalytics, over the 77 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PayAnalytics was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Syndio61 of 7726Compare →

Trusaic PayParity53 of 775Not in the top three

Payscale39 of 774Compare →

beqom20 of 771Not in the top three

Aeqium18 of 771Not in the top three

Compport16 of 770Not in the top three

Pave14 of 774Not in the top three

Figures14 of 771Not in the top three

Gusto12 of 775Not in the top three

Salary.com10 of 770Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PayAnalytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 70 of the 77 answers that named PayAnalytics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com58

peoplemanagingpeople.com51

guideflow.com45

pay-equity-software.com44

worldmetrics.org34

soteriahr.com32

payanalytics.comYour site30

compensationtools.net26

g2.com23

synd.io21

334 of the 364 domain citations in answers naming PayAnalytics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/pay-equity-software57

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-pay-equity-software50

guideflow.com/blog/pay-equity-software45

pay-equity-software.com/tools42

soteriahr.com/pay-equity-analysis-software32

worldmetrics.org/best/pay-equity-software27

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-ai-pay-equity-software26

compensationtools.net/best-pay-equity-software23

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as PayAnalytics

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PayAnalytics; a claim can dispute any of them.

PayAnalytics (Beqom) 1PayAnalytics (by beqom) 1PayAnalytics by beqom 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PayAnalytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PayAnalytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at payanalytics.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.