Every category where a model named beqom for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compensation management	Compensation and total rewards	0%	37 of 189	23%	39	accepted challenger
Pay equity	Compensation and total rewards	0%	25 of 60	27%	11	criticized challenger
Compensation benchmarking data	Compensation and total rewards	0%	91 of 144	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Payscale at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for beqom yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated beqom across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	2	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	4	1	0	5
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	3	5
Perplexity Sonar	2	1	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	3	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	2	7	11
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	2	1	4
Kimi K2	1	3	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	3	0	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	3	2	0	5

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct23 labels7

Paraphrase36 labels6

Comparative52 labels10not counted in share

Budget-constrained23 labels4

Scale-constrained22 labels2

Negative24 labels9not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative180 labels in all, every segment counted; 19 of the 38 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For larger enterprise needs (500-1,000), scalability becomes critical, with Beqom, HRSoft, and Workday as frequent finalists.” MiniMax M2.5 · Compensation management · scale prompt · alternative

“Choose if you operate across many global regions, pay equity analysis and benchmark data are top strategic priorities” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compensation management · comparative prompt · alternative

“best for mid-market and enterprise companies (500+ employees) with complex sales compensation structures” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compensation benchmarkin · direct prompt · alternative

“best if you want a more robust compensation management platform for larger or more complex structures” GPT-5.4 mini · Compensation management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid platforms like beqom or large enterprise suites unless you have a dedicated comp team” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compensation management · direct prompt · hard negative

“Steer clear of enterprise tools like Workday Compensation, beqom, or HRSoft” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compensation management · budget prompt · hard negative

“When to Avoid Enterprise Tools (Like Syndio or Beqom)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Pay equity · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“too small to justify the heavy implementation costs and complexity of enterprise tools like Workday or beqom” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compensation management · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as beqom, over the 135 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and beqom was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Payscale67 of 1355Not in the top three

Pave56 of 13517Not in the top three

HRSoft46 of 1351Not in the top three

Syndio42 of 13521Not in the top three

Workday Compensation40 of 13515Not in the top three

Salary.com40 of 1350Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ39 of 1352Not in the top three

Compport33 of 1351Not in the top three

Workday32 of 1351Not in the top three

Comprehensive28 of 1359Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named beqom. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 117 of the 135 answers that named beqom and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com78

guideflow.com61

comprehensive.io56

peoplemanagingpeople.com51

darwinbox.com41

learn.g2.com41

g2.com40

ravio.com38

captivateiq.com33

compport.com33

472 of the 472 domain citations in answers naming beqom came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

comprehensive.io/content/best-compensation-management-software53

gartner.com/reviews/market/compensation-management-software51

darwinbox.com/blog/8-best-compensation-management-software-enterprises41

learn.g2.com/best-compensation-management-software40

gartner.com/reviews/market/pay-equity-software31

hibob.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software28

bestrecruitingtools.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software-enterprise-202627

captivateiq.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software27

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as beqom

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as beqom; a claim can dispute any of them.

Beqom 18beqom (PaySuite) 1beqom (featuring PayAnalytics) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when beqom's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as beqom, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at beqom.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.