Every category where a model named HRSoft for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compensation management	Compensation and total rewards	0%	53 of 189	29%	14	criticized challenger
Pay equity	Compensation and total rewards	0%	26 of 60	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Syndio at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HRSoft yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated HRSoft across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	3	1	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	3	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	2	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labelsNone

Comparative22 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels2

Scale-constrained11 labels1

Negative13 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative71 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“HRSoft targets HR and compensation teams at mid-market organizations that manage structured merit and bonus cycles” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Pay equity · direct prompt · alternative

“Best if you operate at midmarket or enterprise scale, manage multiple compensation cycles and equity plans” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compensation management · comparative prompt · alternative

“HRSoft is an excellent choice for SMB and mid-market teams seeking pay gap analysis and equity monitoring.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Pay equity · budget prompt · alternative

“better fits if you mean broad compensation management for HR purposes” GPT-5.4 mini · Compensation management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Steer clear of enterprise tools like Workday Compensation, beqom, or HRSoft” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compensation management · budget prompt · hard negative

“they are highly services-heavy, often requiring dedicated implementation consultants and administrative support” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compensation management · comparative prompt · soft negative

“Note: It is services-heavy and requires consultant-supported implementation.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compensation management · comparative prompt · soft negative

“Enterprise tools like Beqom and HRSoft may be overkill” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compensation management · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HRSoft, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HRSoft was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

beqom46 of 5516Not in the top three

Payscale30 of 551Not in the top three

Pave27 of 559Not in the top three

Compport22 of 552Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ22 of 551Not in the top three

Salary.com21 of 550Not in the top three

Workday Compensation19 of 559Not in the top three

Comprehensive17 of 556Not in the top three

Workday17 of 552Not in the top three

CompLogix17 of 551Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HRSoft. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 55 answers that named HRSoft and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com30

comprehensive.io24

guideflow.com22

peoplemanagingpeople.com22

ravio.com19

darwinbox.com17

compport.com16

learn.g2.com16

captivateiq.com15

g2.com13

194 of the 194 domain citations in answers naming HRSoft came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

comprehensive.io/content/best-compensation-management-software23

gartner.com/reviews/market/compensation-management-software21

darwinbox.com/blog/8-best-compensation-management-software-enterprises17

learn.g2.com/best-compensation-management-software15

captivateiq.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software13

guideflow.com/blog/compensation-management-software11

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-compensation-management-software11

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-pay-equity-software11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as HRSoft

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HRSoft; a claim can dispute any of them.

HRSoft (COMPview) 2HRsoft 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HRSoft's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HRSoft, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hrsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.