Every category where a model named CompLogix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compensation management	Compensation and total rewards	5%	4 of 189	5%	20	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CompLogix yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CompLogix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	3	0	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	1	0	3
Mistral Small	0	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct19 labels7

Paraphrase10 labels4

Comparative12 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative6 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative54 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd suggest evaluating CompLogix (if you need deep configurability) or HiBob (if you prefer an all-in-one HRIS platform) as your top choices.” MiniMax M2.5 · Compensation management · direct prompt · first choice

“CompLogix (Best Overall for Complexity & Configurability) ... CompLogix is the industry leader for the mid-market.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compensation management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“CompLogix (Best Overall for Configurability and Support)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Compensation management · direct prompt · first choice

“I'd suggest prioritizing Comprehensive or CompLogix” Kimi K2 · Compensation management · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“they are highly services-heavy, often requiring dedicated implementation consultants and administrative support” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compensation management · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CompLogix, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CompLogix was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

beqom24 of 4313Not in the top three

Pave23 of 438Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ21 of 431Not in the top three

Workday18 of 431Not in the top three

HRSoft17 of 431Not in the top three

Payscale17 of 431Not in the top three

HiBob16 of 433Not in the top three

Aeqium13 of 434Not in the top three

Compport13 of 432Not in the top three

Salary.com13 of 430Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CompLogix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 43 answers that named CompLogix and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

comprehensive.io31

gartner.com27

guideflow.com20

learn.g2.com20

hibob.com18

darwinbox.com15

complogix.ioYour site13

ravio.com13

captivateiq.com12

deel.com12

168 of the 181 domain citations in answers naming CompLogix came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

comprehensive.io/content/best-compensation-management-software30

gartner.com/reviews/market/compensation-management-software27

learn.g2.com/best-compensation-management-software19

hibob.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software18

darwinbox.com/blog/8-best-compensation-management-software-enterprises15

complogix.io/blog/compensation-planning-software13

guideflow.com/blog/compensation-planning-software13

captivateiq.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CompLogix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CompLogix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at complogix.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.