16 categories · RankedHiBob
271Judge labels
33First choices
23Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
16Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in People analytics for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 99 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 22 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business11 of 96
2%13 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market1 of 99
15%22 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise20 of 71
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named HiBob for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 15% | 1 of 99 | 5% | 22 | accepted challenger |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | Core HR and payroll | 15% | 3 of 46 | 0% | 26 | accepted challenger |
| Employee onboarding | Onboarding and employee experience | 7% | 4 of 104 | 8% | 26 | accepted challenger |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 7% | 5 of 60 | 0% | 23 | accepted challenger |
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 6% | 6 of 119 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger |
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 5% | 5 of 189 | 22% | 27 | accepted challenger |
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 4% | 7 of 89 | 7% | 14 | accepted challenger |
| HR compliance and policy management | Core HR and payroll | 2% | 15 of 84 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 16% |
| Leave and absence management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 19 of 89 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger |
| Workforce management suites | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 18 of 95 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by ADP Workforce Now at 19% |
| HR help desk and case management | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 29 of 93 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 26% |
| Pay equity | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 30 of 60 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Syndio at 17% |
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 36 of 129 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26% |
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 63 of 81 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 27% |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 44 of 99 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 31% |
| 360 feedback | Performance and talent management | 0% | 66 of 77 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 40% |
Movement
This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HiBob yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.
By model
How each model treated HiBob across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 13 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 23 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 6 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 20 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 13 |
| Mistral Small | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 12 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 22 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 12 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 21 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 17 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct101 labels17
Paraphrase51 labels14
Comparative61 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labels1
Scale-constrained32 labels1
Negative17 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative271 labels in all, every segment counted; 33 of the 39 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for mid-sized teams running structured reviews... a smart, modern choice if you want to level up reviews without adding another separate tool” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Performance management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“HiBob is designed for fast-growing mid-market companies (typically 50–2,000 employees) that want an all-in-one HRIS with embedded people analytics” Claude Haiku 4.5 · People analytics · direct prompt · first choice
“HiBob – Best for modern mid-market HR teams... HiBob and BambooHR are often highlighted for their modern, user-friendly approaches” Mistral Small · Employee onboarding · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd shortlist Paylocity (modern, balanced, payroll-native) and HiBob (best UX and people analytics for knowledge workers” DeepSeek V4 Flash · HRIS and HCM platforms · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“broad HR suites with basic compensation tools ... typically lack the depth and flexibility of dedicated compensation platforms” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compensation management · comparative prompt · soft negative
“You might already have a basic "360 feature" built into your existing HRIS (e.g., BambooHR, Rippling, HiBob). ... be warned” Gemini 3.5 Flash · 360 feedback · scale prompt · soft negative
“Broad HR suites with basic comp tools; convenient but generally not as deep or flexible as dedicated platforms” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compensation management · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Easy to use and intuitive, but customization limits and reporting depth are common complaints.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce planning · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HiBob, over the 261 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HiBob was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HiBob. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 216 of the 261 answers that named HiBob and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
learn.g2.com92
hibob.comYour site89
peoplemanagingpeople.com88
guideflow.com70
gartner.com66
forbes.com61
g2.com55
hr.university48
hrtechsaas.com44
worldmetrics.org37
561 of the 650 domain citations in answers naming HiBob came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as HiBob
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HiBob; a claim can dispute any of them.
HiBob (Bob) 24HiBob HRIS 14Hibob 3HiBob ("Bob") 2Bob (HiBob) 1HiBob (Compease) 1HiBob (The Bob Platform) 1HiBob (now called **Bob**) 1HiBob / Bob 1HiBob / Rippling 1Hibob (Bob) 1Hibob (HiBob) 1Sapling/HiBob 1
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HiBob's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HiBob, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hibob.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.