13 categories · RankedLeapsome
255Judge labels
8First choices
44Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
13Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Performance management for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 54 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 20 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business42 of 49
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market7 of 54
4%20 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise36 of 53
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In goals and okrs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Leapsome for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 4% | 7 of 54 | 5% | 20 | accepted challenger |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 2% | 8 of 60 | 6% | 31 | accepted challenger |
| 360 feedback | Performance and talent management | 0% | 16 of 77 | 3% | 31 | accepted challenger |
| Employee engagement surveys | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 13 of 77 | 0% | 13 | accepted challenger |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 21 of 99 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 27 of 99 | 25% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by HiBob at 15% |
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 31 of 119 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Workativ Assistant at 12% |
| Leave and absence management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 31 of 89 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28% |
| Coaching platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 72 of 116 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26% |
| Employee onboarding | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 40 of 104 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 29% |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 22 of 46 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 22% |
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 54 of 129 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26% |
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 59 of 162 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19% |
Movement
This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Leapsome yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.
By model
How each model treated Leapsome across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 19 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 11 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 20 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 10 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 16 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 9 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct51 labels2
Paraphrase48 labels2
Comparative59 labelsNone
Budget-constrained15 labels2
Scale-constrained38 labels2
Negative44 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative255 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For a mid-sized B2B company, Leapsome is often the most recommended for its balance of features, ease of use, and scalability.” Mistral Small · Goals and OKRs · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“or Leapsome (analytics embedded with engagement) that offer pre-built connectors without needing a data engineer” DeepSeek V4 Flash · People analytics · negative prompt · first choice
“Leaders in this category typically include Lattice, Culture Amp, 15Five, Leapsome, and PerformYard.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Performance management · scale prompt · first choice
“Primary Recommendation: Leapsome” MiniMax M2.5 · Goals and OKRs · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise-heavy suites when you're a small/mid company (e.g., Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, 15Five)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · 360 feedback · negative prompt · soft negative
“caution is advised if you need specialized people analytics or large-enterprise workforce modeling” Perplexity Sonar · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative
“HR-suite "goals modules" (Lattice, Leapsome, ...) ... Risky if you want dedicated OKR tracking” MiniMax M2.5 · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative
“Leapsome: has a real admin learning curve and thinner native integrations than peers.” Llama 4 Maverick · Performance management · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Leapsome, over the 255 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Leapsome was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Leapsome. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 216 of the 255 answers that named Leapsome and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
betterworks.com86
peoplemanagingpeople.com79
workhuman.com60
forbes.com51
feedbackpulse.com50
guideflow.com49
learn.g2.com48
okrstool.com47
engagedly.com46
selectsoftwarereviews.com45
561 of the 561 domain citations in answers naming Leapsome came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Leapsome
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Leapsome; a claim can dispute any of them.
Lattice/Leapsome 1
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Leapsome's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Leapsome, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at leapsome.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.