Every category where a model named Teamflect for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Succession planning	Performance and talent management	6%	4 of 99	0%	10	accepted challenger
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	4%	7 of 129	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26%
360 feedback	Performance and talent management	2%	8 of 77	7%	15	accepted challenger
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	2%	10 of 54	13%	15	accepted challenger
Performance management	Performance and talent management	2%	10 of 60	0%	10	accepted challenger
Employee engagement surveys	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	17 of 77	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 40%
Recognition and rewards	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	18 of 55	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Bonusly at 22%
HR AI assistants	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	98 of 119	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Workativ Assistant at 12%
Org charts and org design	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	59 of 81	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Teamflect yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Teamflect across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	2	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	19	1	0	23
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	2	1	6
Mistral Small	0	1	2	1	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	3	0	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	4	0	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	0	1	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	5	1	0	6
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	2	0	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels2

Paraphrase12 labelsNone

Comparative49 labels5not counted in share

Budget-constrained33 labels11

Scale-constrained17 labelsNone

Negative22 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative149 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you have fewer than 10 employees: Use Teamflect’s free plan (or download a free Excel template) + Creately for visual mapping. This costs you $0.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Succession planning · budget prompt · first choice

“Best for Teams Under 10: Teamflect ... Teamflect is an exceptional option. Completely free with full functionality for up to 10 users” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Performance management · budget prompt · first choice

“If you are a very small team (<10 people): Go with Teamflect (if on Microsoft 365) or Perdoo (for pure strategy).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice

“For the tightest budget, I'd suggest starting with Creately or Teamflect since they have free tiers.” MiniMax M2.5 · Succession planning · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Teamflect is often praised for its integration with Microsoft 365 but is criticized for not being a full HR solution and lacking live chat support” Mistral Small · 360 feedback · negative prompt · soft negative

“Teamflect (3.5/5, limited for non-Microsoft stacks)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative

“Failed basic setup scenarios in testing” Kimi K2 · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Teamflect, over the 149 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teamflect was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lattice86 of 14913Not in the top three

15Five49 of 1493Not in the top three

Leapsome47 of 1492Not in the top three

PerformYard39 of 1491Not in the top three

Culture Amp34 of 1493Not in the top three

BambooHR34 of 1490Not in the top three

Tability30 of 14915Not in the top three

Betterworks27 of 1497Not in the top three

Profit.co27 of 1494Not in the top three

Small Improvements27 of 1494Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Teamflect. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 93 of the 149 answers that named Teamflect and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

teamflect.comYour site36

firsthr.app34

peoplemanagingpeople.com34

okrstool.com32

capterra.com28

gartner.com27

workhuman.com27

g2.com25

effy.ai24

tability.io24

255 of the 291 domain citations in answers naming Teamflect came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

okrstool.com/blog/best-okr-software22

firsthr.app/compare/performance/succession-planning-software19

talentguard.com/blog/10-best-role-readiness-planning-software-for-202517

feedbackpulse.com/resources/360-feedback-tools15

teamflect.com/blog/hr-tech/best-360-feedback-tools15

workhuman.com/blog/best-360-degree-feedback-software-tools15

betterworks.com/magazine/best-360-degree-feedback-tools14

effy.ai/blog/360-feedback-software14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Teamflect

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Teamflect; a claim can dispute any of them.

Teamflect (Free Starter Plan) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Teamflect's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Teamflect, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at teamflect.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.