Every category where a model named Tability for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	29%	1 of 54	0%	44	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tability yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tability across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	0	2	5
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	1	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	2	1	5
Mistral Small	2	2	0	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	3	1	6
Llama 4 Maverick	2	0	3	5
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	3	1	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	1	2	1	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct30 labels19

Paraphrase15 labels6

Comparative24 labels15not counted in share

Budget-constrained19 labels6

Scale-constrained16 labels2

Negative7 labels4not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative111 labels in all, every segment counted; 33 of the 52 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Tability is built to solve the execution gap. It is highly recommended for Operations, Chiefs of Staff, or business leaders” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“The best OKR software for a company with a limited budget is Tability, which ranks first in a comparison of 12 tools.” Llama 4 Maverick · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice

“a lightweight dedicated tool (Tability, Weekdone, Mooncamp) is justified; ... Profit.co, Perdoo, Tability” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Goals and OKRs · comparative prompt · first choice

“Tability is frequently cited as the best entry point for companies transitioning away from spreadsheets.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tability, over the 111 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tability was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Perdoo71 of 1114Not in the top three

Profit.co58 of 1117Not in the top three

Mooncamp54 of 1115Compare →

OKRs Tool52 of 1119Not in the top three

Lattice41 of 1112Compare →

Weekdone41 of 1112Not in the top three

WorkBoard35 of 1114Not in the top three

Teamflect30 of 1113Not in the top three

15Five30 of 1111Not in the top three

Quantive29 of 1112Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tability. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 97 of the 111 answers that named Tability and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

tability.ioYour site93

okrstool.com77

mooncamp.com75

profit.co40

toolradar.com39

guideflow.com31

worxmate.ai30

firsthr.app29

gartner.com29

synergita.com26

376 of the 469 domain citations in answers naming Tability came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mooncamp.com/blog/best-okr-software59

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software-for-enterprise50

okrstool.com/blog/best-okr-software45

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software40

toolradar.com/guides/best-okr-software38

mooncamp.com/blog/10-best-okr-tools34

guideflow.com/blog/okr-software31

okrstool.com/blog/okr-tools-for-small-businesses29

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tability's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tability, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tability.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.