Every category where a model named Weekdone for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	0%	16 of 54	11%	18	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Weekdone yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Weekdone across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	3
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels2

Comparative17 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labelsNone

Scale-constrained9 labelsNone

Negative13 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative66 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Weekdone or Notion if you're just beginning your OKR journey and have limited budget.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · comparative prompt · alternative

“The Best Dedicated "Lite" Tool: Weekdone ... designed specifically for OKRs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative

“a lightweight dedicated tool (Tability, Weekdone, Mooncamp) is justified” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Goals and OKRs · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best free option if you want the simplest setup: Weekdone” Perplexity Sonar · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Tools scoring below 3.5/5 in independent tests ... Weekdone (2.6/5 overall, weak on ease of use and AI)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · hard negative

“The product has aged with no AI features, absent certifications, and a small review base” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Weekdone, over the 66 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Weekdone was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Perdoo46 of 665Not in the top three

Tability41 of 6619Not in the top three

Profit.co32 of 665Not in the top three

OKRs Tool28 of 669Not in the top three

Mooncamp27 of 661Not in the top three

Lattice23 of 660Not in the top three

15Five22 of 660Not in the top three

Quantive21 of 661Not in the top three

WorkBoard20 of 662Not in the top three

Betterworks18 of 661Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Weekdone. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 57 of the 66 answers that named Weekdone and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

okrstool.com49

tability.io44

mooncamp.com42

toolradar.com25

firsthr.app22

profit.co20

teamflect.com17

guideflow.com16

worxmate.ai16

gartner.com14

265 of the 265 domain citations in answers naming Weekdone came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mooncamp.com/blog/best-okr-software32

okrstool.com/blog/best-okr-software25

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software24

toolradar.com/guides/best-okr-software24

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software-for-enterprise23

firsthr.app/compare/performance/okr-software21

okrstool.com/blog/okr-tools-for-small-businesses21

mooncamp.com/blog/10-best-okr-tools19

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Weekdone's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Weekdone, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at weekdone.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.