Every category where a model named OKRs Tool for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	9%	4 of 54	6%	16	accepted challenger
Performance management	Performance and talent management	0%	41 of 60	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 41%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OKRs Tool yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OKRs Tool across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	1	1	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	2	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels2

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative17 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained26 labels10

Scale-constrained7 labels2

Negative11 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative73 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want a single recommendation, I'd pick OKRs Tool for the best mix of low cost and dedicated OKR functionality.” Perplexity Sonar · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice

“OKRs Tool is often cited as the top choice for small businesses and limited budgets” Mistral Small · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice

“OKRs Tool at $49/month flat is the standout value pick.” Kimi K2 · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice

“1. OKRs Tool — Best overall value for tight budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“and OKRsTool (lacks security/customization)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OKRs Tool, over the 73 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OKRs Tool was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tability52 of 7322Not in the top three

Perdoo46 of 734Not in the top three

Profit.co34 of 736Not in the top three

Mooncamp30 of 730Not in the top three

Weekdone28 of 733Not in the top three

Lattice25 of 730Not in the top three

Betterworks22 of 734Not in the top three

Teamflect21 of 732Not in the top three

WorkBoard18 of 732Not in the top three

15Five17 of 730Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OKRs Tool. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 68 of the 73 answers that named OKRs Tool and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

okrstool.comYour site64

tability.io60

mooncamp.com54

synergita.com28

topickz.com27

firsthr.app26

profit.co24

toolradar.com23

guideflow.com17

worxmate.ai17

276 of the 340 domain citations in answers naming OKRs Tool came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mooncamp.com/blog/best-okr-software42

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software38

okrstool.com/blog/best-okr-software35

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software-for-enterprise34

mooncamp.com/blog/10-best-okr-tools33

okrstool.com/blog/okr-tools-for-small-businesses29

firsthr.app/compare/performance/okr-software24

toolradar.com/guides/best-okr-software22

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as OKRs Tool

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OKRs Tool; a claim can dispute any of them.

OKRs Tool (okrstool.com) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OKRs Tool's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OKRs Tool, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at okrstool.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.