Every category where a model named Mooncamp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	11%	3 of 54	0%	25	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mooncamp yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mooncamp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	2	3
Mistral Small	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct27 labels6

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative15 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels3

Scale-constrained9 labelsNone

Negative11 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative73 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Tability or Mooncamp for the best balance of features, price, and ease of use” Kimi K2 · Goals and OKRs · direct prompt · first choice

“Tability and Mooncamp are the top choices due to their strong mid-market focus” Mistral Small · Goals and OKRs · direct prompt · first choice

“Mooncamp has risen quickly to the top of rankings for mid-to-large organizations” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · direct prompt · first choice

“For most mid-market B2B companies, Mooncamp offers the best balance” MiniMax M2.5 · Goals and OKRs · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mooncamp, over the 73 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mooncamp was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tability54 of 7323Compare →

Perdoo41 of 733Not in the top three

Profit.co40 of 734Not in the top three

WorkBoard35 of 734Not in the top three

Lattice35 of 732Compare →

Betterworks32 of 735Not in the top three

OKRs Tool30 of 734Not in the top three

Weekdone27 of 732Not in the top three

Quantive25 of 731Not in the top three

15Five21 of 730Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mooncamp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 68 of the 73 answers that named Mooncamp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mooncamp.comYour site62

tability.io61

okrstool.com55

profit.co32

toolradar.com29

topickz.com28

guideflow.com27

gartner.com24

worxmate.ai24

peoplemanagingpeople.com22

302 of the 364 domain citations in answers naming Mooncamp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mooncamp.com/blog/best-okr-software50

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software-for-enterprise36

okrstool.com/blog/best-okr-software33

toolradar.com/guides/best-okr-software28

guideflow.com/blog/okr-software27

gartner.com/reviews/market/okr-software24

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software24

okrstool.com/blog/okr-software23

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mooncamp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mooncamp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mooncamp.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.