Every category where a model named Perdoo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	7%	5 of 54	3%	39	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Perdoo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Perdoo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	2	1	0	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	1	1	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	1	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	4	1	0	5
Mistral Small	0	2	1	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	2	1	0	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	4	0	1	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	0	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct23 labels1

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative33 labels5not counted in share

Budget-constrained18 labels3

Scale-constrained11 labelsNone

Negative13 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative103 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Perdoo, Tability, Mooncamp give structured OKR execution without enterprise configuration overhead.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Goals and OKRs · comparative prompt · first choice

“If you want strict adherence to traditional OKR frameworks, Perdoo is excellent.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · comparative prompt · first choice

“Go with Teamflect (if on Microsoft 365) or Perdoo (for pure strategy).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice

“If you want pure OKRs: start with Perdoo” GPT-5.4 mini · Goals and OKRs · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Dated interface (though free tier available)” Kimi K2 · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Perdoo, over the 103 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Perdoo was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tability71 of 10335Not in the top three

Profit.co61 of 1039Not in the top three

OKRs Tool46 of 10312Not in the top three

Lattice46 of 1032Not in the top three

Weekdone46 of 1032Not in the top three

WorkBoard43 of 1035Not in the top three

Mooncamp41 of 1035Not in the top three

Quantive33 of 1031Not in the top three

Betterworks31 of 1031Not in the top three

15Five27 of 1031Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Perdoo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 89 of the 103 answers that named Perdoo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

tability.io77

okrstool.com70

mooncamp.com68

profit.co42

toolradar.com35

worxmate.ai32

firsthr.app28

guideflow.com26

gartner.com24

synergita.com24

426 of the 426 domain citations in answers naming Perdoo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mooncamp.com/blog/best-okr-software55

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software-for-enterprise49

okrstool.com/blog/best-okr-software40

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software38

toolradar.com/guides/best-okr-software34

firsthr.app/compare/performance/okr-software27

guideflow.com/blog/okr-software26

mooncamp.com/blog/10-best-okr-tools26

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Perdoo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Perdoo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at perdoo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.