Manatal vs Workable
Zero of fourteen models named Manatal first on the direct prompt; seven named Workable. Manatal was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Workable by fourteen and Manatal carries 24 labels and Workable 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in nine categories this edition.
Named in thirteen categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI recruiting assistants page.
By framing
ManatalFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWorkable
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Manatal and Workable were named in the same answer ninety-two times, of the 296 answers naming Manatal and the 327 naming Workable. In those answers Workable took the first choice seventeen times and Manatal twenty-five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Manatal Workable first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Manatal on the left and Workable on the right.The direct prompt
Workable first, Manatal an alternative
7 of 14 modelsManatal was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Manatal29%#1 of 9Workable14%#3 of 9Workable2%#– of 13Manatal0%#– of 13What the models said about Manatal
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Manatal – repeatedly called out as the budget AI recruiter.... "Best For: AI-powered recruiting on a budget"the budget AI recruiter” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Aim for tools like Manatal (affordable AI built-in), Juicebox (sourcing), or monday agents (end-to-end) suited for mid-sized teams.” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about Workable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“significantly cheaper than enterprise competitors like Workable (which starts around $299/month)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · soft negative
“All-in-one mid-market pick: Workable – AI-assisted all-in-one ... the most popular all-in-one option at this price tier” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.