Lever vs candidate.fyi
Four of twelve models named Lever first on the direct prompt; zero named candidate.fyi. Lever was named by eleven of the twelve models and candidate.fyi by six and Lever carries 28 labels and candidate.fyi 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in nine categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the interview scheduling page.
By framing
LeverFirst choices, of twelve modelscandidate.fyi
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
Lever candidate.fyi first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Lever on the left and candidate.fyi on the right.The direct prompt
Lever first, candidate.fyi not the choice
4 of 12 modelscandidate.fyi was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
candidate.fyi21%#2 of 9Lever0%#8 of 9What the models said about Lever
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“its native scheduling tool is frequently cited by users as having the "absolute worst UX."” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Less structured tools, pricier renewals ... they're overkill (and 2-5x costlier) for most mid-sized B2B ops” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
What the models said about candidate.fyi
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Built specifically for companies of your size. Strong zero-click automation, heavy interviewer training logic, and branded portals.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“prioritize tools with panel support like GoodTime alternatives (e.g., candidate.fyi, ModernLoop)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
“Best for complex panels/enterprise orchestration: GoodTime, candidate.fyi” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.