HR AI Index
Index Talent acquisition Interview scheduling › ModernLoop vs Greenhouse
Interview scheduling · September 2026 Edition

ModernLoop vs Greenhouse

Five of twelve models named ModernLoop first on the direct prompt; three named Greenhouse. ModernLoop was named by eleven of the twelve models and Greenhouse by twelve and ModernLoop carries 29 labels and Greenhouse 28, so the shares are not directly comparable.

ModernLoop

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Greenhouse

accepted challenger

Named in thirteen categories this edition.

First-choice share15%13%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate10%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels2928A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ModernLoop reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lever was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. Calendly vs ModernLoop · Calendly vs Greenhouse

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the interview scheduling page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ModernLoopFirst choices, of twelve modelsGreenhouse
Direct53
Paraphrase141 against Greenhouse
Comparative00
Budget-constrained001 against ModernLoop · 1 against Greenhouse
Scale-constrained20
Negative102 against ModernLoop
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ModernLoop and Greenhouse stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 12 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
DeepSeek V4 FlashGreenhouse, ModernLoop alternatives: Ashby, Calendly, Lever

ModernLoop first, Greenhouse an alternative

4 of 12 modelsGreenhouse was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashModernLoop alternatives: Ashby, candidate.fyi
Perplexity SonarModernLoop alternatives: GoodTime, Lever
Llama 4 MaverickModernLoop alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever
GLM 4.7 FlashXModernLoop alternatives: GoodTime, Lever, candidate.fyi

Greenhouse first, ModernLoop an alternative

2 of 12 modelsModernLoop was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Cronofy, Greenhouse alternatives: Calendly, Koalendar, ModernLoop
Qwen 3.7 FlashGreenhouse alternatives: Calendly, GoodTime, Lever, LimeLight, Lunacal

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastGoodTime, Lever alternatives: Greenhouse, ModernLoop
Mistral SmallLever alternatives: Koalendar, ModernLoop
Kimi K2Lever alternatives: GoodTime, Greenhouse, ModernLoop
MiniMax M2.5Cal.com, Lever alternatives: GoodTime, Greenhouse, ModernLoop

Neither was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniGoodTime alternatives: Ashby, Calendly

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
ModernLoop0%#11 of 11
Greenhouse0%#8 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
ModernLoop leads by two points.
ModernLoop15%#2 of 11
Greenhouse13%#3 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Greenhouse leads at enterprise.
Greenhouse7%#3 of 9
ModernLoop0%#5 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about ModernLoop

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Enterprise, quote-only, often thousands per month — avoid these on a limited budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“expensive administrative overkill for small-to-midsize companies (under 100 employees)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“ModernLoop can add friction and slow your process” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“ModernLoop is the strongest default choice because it is repeatedly positioned as a mid-market tool with strong automation” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
“The Top Pick: ModernLoop ... widely considered the strongest standalone scheduling tool for mid-market companies” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“Add ModernLoop (or Calendly for lighter needs) on top — it's the value sweet spot for mid-market.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Greenhouse

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Expensive, longer setup (4-8 wks), quote-only ... they're overkill (and 2-5x costlier) for most mid-sized B2B ops” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Greenhouse is a strong fit for mid-size to enterprise companies with dedicated recruiting teams managing high volumes of interviews” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.