HR AI Index
Index Talent acquisition Recruiting CRM › Lever vs Gem
Recruiting CRM and sourcing · September 2026 Edition

Lever vs Gem

Three of twelve models named Lever first on the direct prompt; six named Gem. Lever was named by ten of the twelve models and Gem by twelve and Lever carries 16 labels and Gem 39, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Lever

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

Gem

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share20%18%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%3%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1639A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Lever reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.SeekOut was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. Lever vs Manatal · Gem vs Manatal

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the Recruiting CRM and sourcing page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LeverFirst choices, of twelve modelsGem
Direct36
Paraphrase62
Comparative02
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative011 against Gem
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Lever and Gem stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 12 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Mistral SmallGem, Lever alternatives: Juicebox, SeekOut, hireEZ

Lever first, Gem an alternative

2 of 12 modelsGem was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.1 FastLever alternatives: LinkedIn Recruiter, Workable
MiniMax M2.5Lever, SeekOut alternatives: Findem, Gem, hireEZ

Gem first, Lever not the choice

5 of 12 modelsLever was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Gem, hireEZ alternatives: Jobvite, Loxo, SeekOut
Gemini 3.5 FlashGem alternatives: Fetcher, SeekOut, ZoomInfo Talent, hireEZ
Perplexity SonarGem alternatives: Fetcher, SeekOut, Workable, hireEZ
DeepSeek V4 FlashGem alternatives: LinkedIn Recruiter, SeekOut, hireEZ
GLM 4.7 FlashXGem alternatives: Juicebox, Manatal, SeekOut, hireEZ

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Qwen 3.7 FlashLinkedIn Recruiter alternatives: Gem, Gorilla Search, SeekOut
Kimi K2hireEZ alternatives: Gem, LinkedIn Recruiter

Neither was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniLinkedIn Recruiter alternatives: SeekOut, Workable, Zoho Recruit
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Lever2%#– of 13
Gem2%#7 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Lever leads by two points.
Lever20%#1 of 11
Gem18%#2 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Gem leads at enterprise.
Gem10%#4 of 6
Lever8%#– of 6
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Lever

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“If you want one default recommendation without more context, Lever is the best starting point for a mid-sized B2B in-house recruiting team.” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Lever: Ideal for mid-sized in-house teams wanting an all-in-one ATS + CRM with native sourcing and nurturing capabilities” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Lever as the default recommendation due to its strong balance of CRM capabilities and ATS integration” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Gem

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Gem — widely praised for workflow, but users repeatedly report inaccurate/outdated email addresses and scraping issues” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“The Best Standalone CRM: Gem ... Gem is the market standard for high-growth B2B companies with outbound-heavy sourcing models.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Outbound, high\u2011volume, want CRM + analytics | Gem | Best\u2011in\u2011class CRM + AI sourcing; strong reporting for ROI.” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.