Index › Vendors › BLS Occupational Employment Statistics · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

BLS Occupational Employment Statistics

7Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. BLS Occupational Employment Statistics was named 2 times in Compensation benchmarkin and 1 other category, where Payscale led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business8 of 170

under the label threshold

Mid-market57 of 144

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In compensation benchmarkin · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named BLS Occupational Employment Statistics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compensation benchmarking data	Compensation and total rewards	0%	57 of 144	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Payscale at 24%
Pay equity	Compensation and total rewards	0%	36 of 60	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Syndio at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BLS Occupational Employment Statistics yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BLS Occupational Employment Statistics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Supplement with free government data (BLS) if you need defensible numbers for US roles.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compensation benchmarkin · budget prompt · alternative

“completely free government data” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Pay equity · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BLS Occupational Employment Statistics, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BLS Occupational Employment Statistics was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Pave6 of 75Not in the top three

Comprehensive.io4 of 70Not in the top three

Levels.fyi4 of 70Not in the top three

Payscale3 of 72Not in the top three

Figures3 of 70Not in the top three

Ravio3 of 70Not in the top three

Salary.com2 of 70Not in the top three

SalaryExpert2 of 70Not in the top three

Pave Market Data Lite1 of 71Not in the top three

Acterys1 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BLS Occupational Employment Statistics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named BLS Occupational Employment Statistics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pin.com6

ravio.com6

comprehensive.io4

g2.com4

compensation-iq.com3

fitsmallbusiness.com3

jobcompass.ai3

pave.com3

peoplemanagingpeople.com3

salary.com3

No domain is on file for BLS Occupational Employment Statistics, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

pin.com/blog/salary-benchmarking-tools6

ravio.com/blog/the-best-tools-for-salary-benchmarking5

comprehensive.io/content/best-compensation-benchmarking-data-sources4

ravio.com/blog/compensation-benchmarking-companies4

ravio.com/blog/free-salary-data4

compensation-iq.com/blog/the-ultimate-guide-to-salary-benchmarking-survey-providers3

fitsmallbusiness.com/salary-comparison-tools3

jobcompass.ai/blog/salary-benchmarking-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BLS Occupational Employment Statistics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BLS Occupational Employment Statistics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.