Every category where a model named Comprehensive.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compensation benchmarking data	Compensation and total rewards	12%	3 of 144	0%	12	accepted challenger
Compensation management	Compensation and total rewards	0%	41 of 189	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18%
Pay equity	Compensation and total rewards	0%	28 of 60	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Syndio at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Comprehensive.io yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Comprehensive.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	0	3
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels2

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative10 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained33 labels6

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative61 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“three free salary benchmarking tools cover most needs at zero cost: Pave (tech roles, under 200 employees), Comprehensive.io (US tech daily data), and BLS OEWS” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compensation benchmarkin · budget prompt · first choice

“Free daily-refreshed tech salary data from 6,000+ U.S. companies (no participation needed) ... Great for startups/lean teams.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Compensation benchmarkin · budget prompt · first choice

“Pave and Comprehensive.io are currently leading the market for affordable or free options” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compensation benchmarkin · budget prompt · first choice

“If you want one default recommendation, Comprehensive.io is the strongest low-cost option” Perplexity Sonar · Compensation benchmarkin · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Comprehensive.io, over the 56 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Comprehensive.io was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Pave45 of 5629Compare →

Ravio37 of 562Not in the top three

Payscale26 of 563Compare →

Salary.com15 of 560Not in the top three

Salary.com CompAnalyst14 of 562Not in the top three

BambooHR14 of 561Not in the top three

Mercer14 of 561Not in the top three

Levels.fyi14 of 560Not in the top three

Radford12 of 560Not in the top three

Aeqium9 of 561Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Comprehensive.io. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 49 of the 56 answers that named Comprehensive.io and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ravio.com35

comprehensive.ioYour site33

pin.com26

fitsmallbusiness.com18

g2.com18

firsthr.app16

gartner.com15

peoplemanagingpeople.com15

ficstar.com13

learn.g2.com13

169 of the 202 domain citations in answers naming Comprehensive.io came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

pin.com/blog/salary-benchmarking-tools26

ravio.com/blog/the-best-tools-for-salary-benchmarking23

ravio.com/blog/compensation-benchmarking-companies19

comprehensive.io/content/best-compensation-benchmarking-data-sources18

comprehensive.io/content/best-compensation-management-software18

firsthr.app/compare/payroll/compensation-management-tools16

fitsmallbusiness.com/salary-comparison-tools14

ficstar.com/best-compensation-benchmarking-data-providers-202613

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Comprehensive.io

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Comprehensive.io; a claim can dispute any of them.

Comprehensive 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Comprehensive.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Comprehensive.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at comprehensive.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.