HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Built In · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Built In

7Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Built In was named 5 times in Job advertising and 1 other category, where JobTarget led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In job advertising · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Built In for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Job advertising and distributionTalent acquisition0%22 of 1090%4under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 21%
Compensation managementCompensation and total rewards0%94 of 1890%1under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Built In yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Built In across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01102
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“in favor of niche networks (e.g., Wellfound or BuiltIn for tech)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Job advertising · negative prompt · alternative
“They have local-focused career sites for major tech hubs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Job advertising · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Built In for geography‑focused tech roles.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Job advertising · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Built In, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Built In was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Indeed5 of 73Not in the top three
Wellfound5 of 70Not in the top three
ZipRecruiter4 of 70Not in the top three
LinkedIn3 of 72Not in the top three
Google for Jobs3 of 71Not in the top three
CareerBuilder3 of 70Not in the top three
Monster3 of 70Not in the top three
LinkedIn Jobs2 of 71Not in the top three
Craigslist2 of 70Not in the top three
Dice2 of 70Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Built In. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 7 answers that named Built In and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com3
builtin.comYour site2
firsthr.app2
glozo.com2
ismartrecruit.com2
learn.g2.com2
noon.ai2
articuler.ai1
bestjobsearchapps.com1
blog.theinterviewguys.com1

Sixteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming Built In came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Built In

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Built In; a claim can dispute any of them.
BuiltIn 2
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Built In's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Built In, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at builtin.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack