| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 5% | 5 of 109 | 24% | 25 | accepted challenger |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 80 of 81 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16% |
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 129 of 189 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% |
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 51 of 88 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lever at 20% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd suggest ZipRecruiter because: ✅ Broad distribution (100+ boards)” MiniMax M2.5 · Job advertising · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most small businesses, ZipRecruiter is the best option” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Job advertising · budget prompt · first choice
“A Connector Tool (Like ZipRecruiter or Jobvite) to distribute the above posts to lesser-known boards automatically.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Job advertising · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If you are a lean HR team that wants to write a post once and blast it everywhere, choose ZipRecruiter.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Job advertising · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Job scams appear on platforms like ZipRecruiter and LinkedIn, with scammers using complex schemes to lure job seekers into financial traps.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Many major platforms (including Indeed and ZipRecruiter) have shifted heavily toward pay-per-click or pay-per-application models” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Job advertising · negative prompt · soft negative
“some users report that its job matching algorithm is ineffective and that it may repost outdated or fake listings” Mistral Small · Job advertising · negative prompt · soft negative
“Ineffective matching, ghost jobs, scammers hijack listings; mixed ROI complaints despite some successes.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Job advertising · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 71 of the 86 answers that named ZipRecruiter and are not a share of its labels.
183 of the 206 domain citations in answers naming ZipRecruiter came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ZipRecruiter's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ZipRecruiter, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ziprecruiter.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.